
Celeron 4305UE

Pentium G3240T
Celeron 4305UE vs Pentium G3240T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron 4305UE vs Pentium G3240T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron 4305UE vs Pentium G3240T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron 4305UE
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Pentium G3240T needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 26.5 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
Pentium G3240T
2014Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Costs $43 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 66.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.5 vs 15.9 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,693 vs 1,699).
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 4305UE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron 4305UE better than Pentium G3240T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 4305UE vs Pentium G3240T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 4305UE
The Celeron 4305UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,699 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium G3240T
The Pentium G3240T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,693 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron 4305UE and Pentium G3240T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Celeron 4305UE is built on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 4305UE scores 1,699 against the Pentium G3240T's 1,693 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron 4305UE. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 4305UE vs 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Pentium G3240T.
| Feature | Celeron 4305UE | Pentium G3240T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | — | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | — |
| Process | 10 nm-55% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) | — |
| PassMark | 1,699 | 1,693 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 670 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,065 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 4305UE uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G3240T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron 4305UE | Pentium G3240T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1528 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron 4305UE) / not specified (Pentium G3240T). The Celeron 4305UE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Pentium G3240T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 4305UE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 4305UE rivals Athlon Silver 3050GE.
| Feature | Celeron 4305UE | Pentium G3240T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 610 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron 4305UE was priced at $107, while the Pentium G3240T came in at $64. On launch pricing ($107 vs $64), Pentium G3240T was $43 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 4305UE delivers 15.9 pts/$ vs 26.5 pts/$ for the Pentium G3240T — making the Pentium G3240T the 50% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 4305UE | Pentium G3240T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $107 | $64-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.9 | 26.5+67% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














