Celeron 4305UE vs Pentium G3240T

Intel

Celeron 4305UE

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 2 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Pentium G3240T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WW2014

Celeron 4305UE vs Pentium G3240T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 4305UE vs Pentium G3240T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 4305UE vs Pentium G3240T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 4305UE

2018

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Pentium G3240T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 26.5 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).

Pentium G3240T

2014

Why buy it

  • +50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
  • Costs $43 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
  • Delivers 66.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.5 vs 15.9 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,693 vs 1,699).
  • 133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Celeron 4305UE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 4305UE better than Pentium G3240T?
Yes. Celeron 4305UE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Celeron 4305UE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 4305UE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron 4305UE is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron 4305UE comes in 67.2% more expensive on MSRP at $107 MSRP versus $64 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium G3240T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 66.6% better value on paper (26.5 vs 15.9 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 4305UE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 4305UE vs Pentium G3240T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron 4305UE

The Celeron 4305UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,699 points. Launch price was $107.

Intel

Pentium G3240T

The Pentium G3240T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,693 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 4305UE and Pentium G3240T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Celeron 4305UE is built on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 4305UE scores 1,699 against the Pentium G3240T's 1,693 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron 4305UE. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 4305UE vs 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Pentium G3240T.

FeatureCeleron 4305UEPentium G3240T
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
3 MB Intel® Smart Cache+50%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
Process
10 nm-55%
22 nm
Architecture
Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
PassMark
1,699
1,693
Geekbench 6 Single
670
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,065
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 4305UE uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G3240T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 4305UEPentium G3240T
Socket
FCBGA1528
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron 4305UE) / not specified (Pentium G3240T). The Celeron 4305UE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Pentium G3240T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 4305UE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 4305UE rivals Athlon Silver 3050GE.

FeatureCeleron 4305UEPentium G3240T
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 4305UE was priced at $107, while the Pentium G3240T came in at $64. On launch pricing ($107 vs $64), Pentium G3240T was $43 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 4305UE delivers 15.9 pts/$ vs 26.5 pts/$ for the Pentium G3240T — making the Pentium G3240T the 50% better value option.

FeatureCeleron 4305UEPentium G3240T
MSRP
$107
$64-40%
Performance per Dollar
15.9
26.5+67%
Release Date
2018
2014

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.