A4 PRO-3340B vs Celeron 4305UE

A4 PRO-3340B vs Celeron 4305UE Performance Spectrum

A4 PRO-3340B

4 / 4

1,709

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron 4305UE

2 / 2

1,699

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4 PRO-3340B vs Celeron 4305UE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4 PRO-3340B vs Celeron 4305UE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4 PRO-3340B

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌66.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 15W.

Celeron 4305UE

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 25W, a 10W reduction.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A4 PRO-3340B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,699 vs 1,709).
❌Launch MSRP is still $107 MSRP, while A4 PRO-3340B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is A4 PRO-3340B better than Celeron 4305UE?

Yes. A4 PRO-3340B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A4 PRO-3340B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4 PRO-3340B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4 PRO-3340B is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. A4 PRO-3340B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron 4305UE only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 4.4% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 4305UE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4 PRO-3340B vs Celeron 4305UE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4 PRO-3340B

The A4 PRO-3340B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 December 2014 (10 years ago). It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,709 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron 4305UE

The Celeron 4305UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,699 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4 PRO-3340B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron 4305UE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A4 PRO-3340B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the A4 PRO-3340B versus 2 GHz on the Celeron 4305UE — a 9.5% clock advantage for the A4 PRO-3340B. The A4 PRO-3340B uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron 4305UE uses Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) (10 nm). In PassMark, the A4 PRO-3340B scores 1,709 against the Celeron 4305UE's 1,699 — a 0.6% lead for the A4 PRO-3340B. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 200 vs 670, a 108% lead for the Celeron 4305UE that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	A4 PRO-3340B	Celeron 4305UE
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+10%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	—	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	10 nm-64%
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
PassMark	1,709	1,699
Geekbench 6 Single	200	670+235%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,065

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4 PRO-3340B uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 4305UE uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A4 PRO-3340B versus DDR4-2133 on the Celeron 4305UE — the Celeron 4305UE supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 4305UE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A4 PRO-3340B) vs 2 (Celeron 4305UE). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4 PRO-3340B) vs 16 (Celeron 4305UE) — the Celeron 4305UE offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A4 PRO-3340B	Celeron 4305UE
Socket	FT3	FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR4-2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	64 GB+300%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4 PRO-3340B) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron 4305UE). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8240 (A4 PRO-3340B) and UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron 4305UE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4 PRO-3340B targets Business Laptop, Celeron 4305UE targets Budget. Direct competitor: A4 PRO-3340B rivals Pentium N3520; Celeron 4305UE rivals Athlon Silver 3050GE.