A4 PRO-3340B vs Pentium G2020

A4 PRO-3340B vs Pentium G2020 Performance Spectrum

A4 PRO-3340B

4 / 4

1,709

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium G2020

2 / 2

1,705

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4 PRO-3340B vs Pentium G2020 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4 PRO-3340B vs Pentium G2020: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4 PRO-3340B

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 25W instead of 55W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8240, while Pentium G2020 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium G2020

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,705 vs 1,709).
❌Launch MSRP is still $64 MSRP, while A4 PRO-3340B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌120% higher power demand at 55W vs 25W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4 PRO-3340B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A4 PRO-3340B better than Pentium G2020?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium G2020 is ahead with a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A4 PRO-3340B pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4 PRO-3340B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4 PRO-3340B is still the much better call for a fresh build. A4 PRO-3340B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $64 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. Pentium G2020 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (26.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4 PRO-3340B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4 PRO-3340B vs Pentium G2020 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4 PRO-3340B

The A4 PRO-3340B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 December 2014 (10 years ago). It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,709 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium G2020

The Pentium G2020 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3072 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,705 points. Launch price was $60.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4 PRO-3340B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium G2020 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A4 PRO-3340B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the A4 PRO-3340B versus 2.9 GHz on the Pentium G2020 — a 27.5% clock advantage for the Pentium G2020 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A4 PRO-3340B uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium G2020 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A4 PRO-3340B scores 1,709 against the Pentium G2020's 1,705 — a 0.2% lead for the A4 PRO-3340B.

Feature	A4 PRO-3340B	Pentium G2020
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	2.9 GHz+32%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.9 GHz+32%
L3 Cache	—	3072 kB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,709	1,705
Geekbench 6 Single	200	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4 PRO-3340B uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G2020 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A4 PRO-3340B	Pentium G2020
Socket	FT3	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4 PRO-3340B) / not specified (Pentium G2020). The A4 PRO-3340B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8240), while the Pentium G2020 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4 PRO-3340B targets Business Laptop. Direct competitor: A4 PRO-3340B rivals Pentium N3520.