A4 PRO-3340B vs Xeon L5335

A4 PRO-3340B vs Xeon L5335 Performance Spectrum

A4 PRO-3340B

4 / 4

1,709

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon L5335

4 / 4

1,737

+1.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4 PRO-3340B vs Xeon L5335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4 PRO-3340B vs Xeon L5335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4 PRO-3340B

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 25W instead of 50W, a 25W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8240, while Xeon L5335 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,709 vs 1,737).

Xeon L5335

2007

Why buy it

✅+1.6% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $380 MSRP, while A4 PRO-3340B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌100% higher power demand at 50W vs 25W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4 PRO-3340B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A4 PRO-3340B better than Xeon L5335?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L5335 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A4 PRO-3340B is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon L5335 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4 PRO-3340B is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon L5335 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. A4 PRO-3340B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $380 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon L5335 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.6% better PassMark. Xeon L5335 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (4.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4 PRO-3340B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4 PRO-3340B vs Xeon L5335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4 PRO-3340B

The A4 PRO-3340B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 December 2014 (10 years ago). It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,709 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon L5335

The Xeon L5335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 August 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,737 points. Launch price was $380.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A4 PRO-3340B and Xeon L5335 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the A4 PRO-3340B versus 2 GHz on the Xeon L5335 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the A4 PRO-3340B (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A4 PRO-3340B uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon L5335 uses Clovertown (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A4 PRO-3340B scores 1,709 against the Xeon L5335's 1,737 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon L5335.

Feature	A4 PRO-3340B	Xeon L5335
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+10%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+10%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	8 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	2048 kB	4 MB (total)+100%
Process	28 nm-57%	65 nm
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	Clovertown (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,709	1,737+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	200	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4 PRO-3340B uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon L5335 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A4 PRO-3340B	Xeon L5335
Socket	FT3	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4 PRO-3340B) / not specified (Xeon L5335). The A4 PRO-3340B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8240), while the Xeon L5335 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4 PRO-3340B targets Business Laptop. Direct competitor: A4 PRO-3340B rivals Pentium N3520.