
A4 PRO-3340B

Core i5-520M
A4 PRO-3340B vs Core i5-520M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A4 PRO-3340B vs Core i5-520M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A4 PRO-3340B vs Core i5-520M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A4 PRO-3340B
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 35W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (200 vs 360).
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,709 vs 1,727).
Core i5-520M
2010Why buy it
- ✅+80% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while A4 PRO-3340B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌40% higher power demand at 35W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-520M better than A4 PRO-3340B?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A4 PRO-3340B vs Core i5-520M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4 PRO-3340B
The A4 PRO-3340B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 December 2014 (10 years ago). It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,709 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-520M
The Core i5-520M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,727 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
The A4 PRO-3340B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-520M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A4 PRO-3340B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the A4 PRO-3340B versus 2.93 GHz on the Core i5-520M — a 28.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-520M (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The A4 PRO-3340B uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-520M uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4 PRO-3340B scores 1,709 against the Core i5-520M's 1,727 — a 1% lead for the Core i5-520M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 200 vs 360, a 57.1% lead for the Core i5-520M that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | A4 PRO-3340B | Core i5-520M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.93 GHz+33% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | — | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+300% | 512 kB |
| Process | 28 nm-13% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Kabini (2013−2014) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,709 | 1,727+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 200 | 360+80% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 695 |
Memory & Platform
The A4 PRO-3340B uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-520M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A4 PRO-3340B versus 1066 on the Core i5-520M — the A4 PRO-3340B supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A4 PRO-3340B supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A4 PRO-3340B) vs 2 (Core i5-520M). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4 PRO-3340B) vs 16 (Core i5-520M) — the Core i5-520M offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A4 PRO-3340B | Core i5-520M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600+50% | 1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4 PRO-3340B) vs true (Core i5-520M). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8240 (A4 PRO-3340B) and Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) (Core i5-520M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4 PRO-3340B targets Business Laptop. Direct competitor: A4 PRO-3340B rivals Pentium N3520; Core i5-520M rivals AMD Turion II Ultra M660.
| Feature | A4 PRO-3340B | Core i5-520M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8240 | Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Business Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















