A4 PRO-3340B vs Core 2 Duo T7200

A4 PRO-3340B vs Core 2 Duo T7200 Performance Spectrum

A4 PRO-3340B

4 / 4

1,709

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Duo T7200

2 / 2

1,717

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4 PRO-3340B vs Core 2 Duo T7200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4 PRO-3340B vs Core 2 Duo T7200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4 PRO-3340B

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8240, while Core 2 Duo T7200 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,709 vs 1,717).
❌525% higher power demand at 25W vs 4W.

Core 2 Duo T7200

2006

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 4W instead of 25W, a 21W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $286 MSRP, while A4 PRO-3340B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4 PRO-3340B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo T7200 better than A4 PRO-3340B?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A4 PRO-3340B is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T7200 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T7200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo T7200 is the better buy right now. Core 2 Duo T7200 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $286 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that A4 PRO-3340B is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4 PRO-3340B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4 PRO-3340B vs Core 2 Duo T7200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4 PRO-3340B

The A4 PRO-3340B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 December 2014 (10 years ago). It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,709 points. Launch price was $69.

Core 2 Duo T7200

The Core 2 Duo T7200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 July 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 34 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,717 points. Launch price was $286.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4 PRO-3340B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T7200 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A4 PRO-3340B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the A4 PRO-3340B versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7200 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the A4 PRO-3340B (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A4 PRO-3340B uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T7200 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A4 PRO-3340B scores 1,709 against the Core 2 Duo T7200's 1,717 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7200.

Feature	A4 PRO-3340B	Core 2 Duo T7200
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+10%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+10%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	2048 kB	4 MB+100%
Process	28 nm-57%	65 nm
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark	1,709	1,717
Geekbench 6 Single	200	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4 PRO-3340B uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T7200 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A4 PRO-3340B versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7200 — the A4 PRO-3340B supports 139.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A4 PRO-3340B) vs 2 (Core 2 Duo T7200).

Feature	A4 PRO-3340B	Core 2 Duo T7200
Socket	FT3	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+140%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4 PRO-3340B) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7200). The A4 PRO-3340B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8240), while the Core 2 Duo T7200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4 PRO-3340B targets Business Laptop, Core 2 Duo T7200 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A4 PRO-3340B rivals Pentium N3520; Core 2 Duo T7200 rivals Athlon 64 X2 TK-42.