A4 PRO-3340B vs Xeon E5502

A4 PRO-3340B vs Xeon E5502 Performance Spectrum

A4 PRO-3340B

4 / 4

1,709

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E5502

2 / 2

1,725

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4 PRO-3340B vs Xeon E5502 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4 PRO-3340B vs Xeon E5502: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4 PRO-3340B

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 25W instead of 80W, a 55W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8240, while Xeon E5502 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,709 vs 1,725).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5502, which brings 2 cores / 2 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5502

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 2 cores / 2 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 8.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A4 PRO-3340B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $188 MSRP, while A4 PRO-3340B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌220% higher power demand at 80W vs 25W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4 PRO-3340B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A4 PRO-3340B better than Xeon E5502?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5502 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A4 PRO-3340B is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5502 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4 PRO-3340B is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5502 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. A4 PRO-3340B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $188 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5502 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.9% better PassMark. Xeon E5502 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4 PRO-3340B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4 PRO-3340B vs Xeon E5502 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4 PRO-3340B

The A4 PRO-3340B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 December 2014 (10 years ago). It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,709 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E5502

The Xeon E5502 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,725 points. Launch price was $95.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4 PRO-3340B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5502 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A4 PRO-3340B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the A4 PRO-3340B versus 1.87 GHz on the Xeon E5502 — a 16.2% clock advantage for the A4 PRO-3340B (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The A4 PRO-3340B uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon E5502 uses Gainestown (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A4 PRO-3340B scores 1,709 against the Xeon E5502's 1,725 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E5502. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 200 vs 200, a 0% lead for the Xeon E5502 that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	A4 PRO-3340B	Xeon E5502
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+18%	1.87 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+18%	1.86 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	Gainestown (2009−2010)
PassMark	1,709	1,725
Geekbench 6 Single	200	200
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	800

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4 PRO-3340B uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5502 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A4 PRO-3340B versus DDR3-800 on the Xeon E5502 — the A4 PRO-3340B supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5502 supports up to 144 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 800% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A4 PRO-3340B) vs 3 (Xeon E5502). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4 PRO-3340B) vs 32 (Xeon E5502) — the Xeon E5502 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A4 PRO-3340B	Xeon E5502
Socket	FT3	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+100%	DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	144 GB+800%
RAM Channels	1	3+200%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	8	32+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4 PRO-3340B) vs true (Xeon E5502). The A4 PRO-3340B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8240), while the Xeon E5502 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4 PRO-3340B targets Business Laptop. Direct competitor: A4 PRO-3340B rivals Pentium N3520.