Celeron G1630 vs Pentium G3240T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1630 vs Pentium G3240T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1630 vs Pentium G3240T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1630

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $22 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
✅Delivers 53.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 40.6 vs 26.5 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Pentium G3240T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌57.1% higher power demand at 55W vs 35W.

Pentium G3240T

2014

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 55W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,693 vs 1,707).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.5 vs 40.6 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1630 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1630 better than Pentium G3240T?

Yes. Celeron G1630 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G1630 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1630 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1630 is the better buy right now. Celeron G1630 comes in $22 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $64 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 53.6% better value on MSRP (40.6 vs 26.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium G3240T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013) and 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G1630 vs Pentium G3240T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1630

The Celeron G1630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,707 points. Launch price was $80.

Pentium G3240T

The Pentium G3240T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,693 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G1630 and Pentium G3240T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Celeron G1630 is built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G1630 scores 1,707 against the Pentium G3240T's 1,693 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron G1630. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1630 vs 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Pentium G3240T.

Feature	Celeron G1630	Pentium G3240T
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	—
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+4%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	3 MB Intel® Smart Cache+50%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	—
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	—
PassMark	1,707	1,693
Geekbench 6 Single	386	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	635	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1630 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G3240T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G1630	Pentium G3240T
Socket	LGA1155	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1630) / not specified (Pentium G3240T). The Celeron G1630 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Pentium G3240T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1630 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1630 rivals Pentium G2030.

Feature	Celeron G1630	Pentium G3240T
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G1630 was priced at $42, while the Pentium G3240T came in at $64. On launch pricing ($42 vs $64), Celeron G1630 was $22 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G1630 delivers 40.6 pts/$ vs 26.5 pts/$ for the Pentium G3240T — making the Celeron G1630 the 42.3% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G1630	Pentium G3240T
MSRP	$42-34%	$64
Performance per Dollar	40.6+53%	26.5
Release Date	2013	2014

Search Celeron G1630 on Amazon

Search Pentium G3240T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.