PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3950 vs Celeron G5905T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3950 vs Celeron G5905T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3950

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
❌
4% HIGHER MSRP
$52 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌45.7% higher power demand at 51W vs 35W.

Celeron G5905T

2020

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Costs $2 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 51W, a 16W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (748 vs 750).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (750 vs 1,100).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3950 better than Celeron G5905T?

Yes. Celeron G3950 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 46.7% better Geekbench multi-core, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G3950 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3950 is the stronger fit. You are getting 46.7% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G3950 is still the better call for a fresh build. Celeron G3950 comes in 4.0% more expensive on MSRP at $52 MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G5905T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 2,356 PassMark with 2 cores and 2 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G5905T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017) and 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G3950 vs Celeron G5905T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3950

The Celeron G3950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,336 points. Launch price was $52.

Celeron G5905T

The Celeron G5905T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,356 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G3950 and Celeron G5905T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Celeron G3950 is built on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G3950 scores 2,336 against the Celeron G5905T's 2,356 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron G5905T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 750 vs 748, a 0.3% lead for the Celeron G3950 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,100 vs 750 (37.8% advantage for the Celeron G3950). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G3950 vs 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G5905T.

Feature	Celeron G3950	Celeron G5905T
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3 GHz	—
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.3 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	4 MB Intel® Smart Cache+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	—
PassMark	2,336	2,356
Geekbench 6 Single	750	748
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,100+47%	750

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3950 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G5905T uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G3950 versus DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5905T — the Celeron G5905T supports 11.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5905T supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3950) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5905T).

Feature	Celeron G3950	Celeron G5905T
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	DDR4-2666+11%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	128 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 610 (Celeron G3950) and UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G5905T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3950 targets Budget, Celeron G5905T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3950 rivals Pentium G4560; Celeron G5905T rivals Pentium Gold G6405T.

Feature	Celeron G3950	Celeron G5905T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 610	UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G3950 was priced at $52, while the Celeron G5905T came in at $50. On launch pricing ($52 vs $50), Celeron G5905T was $2 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3950 delivers 44.9 pts/$ vs 47.1 pts/$ for the Celeron G5905T — making the Celeron G5905T the 4.8% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G3950	Celeron G5905T
MSRP	$52	$50-4%
Performance per Dollar	44.9	47.1+5%
Release Date	2017	2020

Search Celeron G3950 on Amazon

Search Celeron G5905T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.