A10-9600P vs Celeron G3950

CPU

GPU

A10-9600P

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2016

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Celeron G3950

2 Cores2 Thrd51 WWMax: 3 GHz2017

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

A10-9600P vs Celeron G3950 Performance Spectrum

A10-9600P

4 / 4

2,333

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G3950

2 / 2

2,336

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-9600P vs Celeron G3950 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-9600P vs Celeron G3950: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-9600P

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 51W, a 49W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (469 vs 750).
❌Lower PassMark (2,333 vs 2,336).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.2 vs 44.9 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).

Celeron G3950

2017

Why buy it

✅+59.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $76 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).
✅Delivers 146.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 18.2 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌2450% higher power demand at 51W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3950 better than A10-9600P?

Yes. Celeron G3950 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G3950 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3950 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G3950 is the better buy right now. Celeron G3950 comes in $76 cheaper on MSRP at $52 MSRP versus $128 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 146.5% better value on MSRP (44.9 vs 18.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3950 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-9600P vs Celeron G3950 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-9600P

The A10-9600P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,333 points. Launch price was $130.

Celeron G3950

The Celeron G3950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,336 points. Launch price was $52.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-9600P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G3950 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-9600P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the A10-9600P versus 3 GHz on the Celeron G3950 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the A10-9600P (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The A10-9600P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron G3950 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9600P scores 2,333 against the Celeron G3950's 2,336 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G3950. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 469 vs 750, a 46.1% lead for the Celeron G3950 that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	A10-9600P	Celeron G3950
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+10%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	—	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256K (per core)
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,333	2,336
Geekbench 6 Single	469	750+60%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,100

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-9600P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G3950 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the A10-9600P versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G3950 — the Celeron G3950 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3950 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A10-9600P) vs 16 (Celeron G3950) — the Celeron G3950 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A10-9600P	Celeron G3950
Socket	FP4	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-1866	DDR4-2400+29%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	64 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-9600P) vs VT-x (Celeron G3950). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R5 (A10-9600P) and HD Graphics 610 (Celeron G3950) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9600P targets Laptop, Celeron G3950 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-9600P rivals Core i3-6006U; Celeron G3950 rivals Pentium G4560.

Feature	A10-9600P	Celeron G3950
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon R5	HD Graphics 610
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x
Target Use	Laptop	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A10-9600P was priced at $128, while the Celeron G3950 came in at $52. On launch pricing ($128 vs $52), Celeron G3950 was $76 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-9600P delivers 18.2 pts/$ vs 44.9 pts/$ for the Celeron G3950 — making the Celeron G3950 the 84.6% better value option.

Feature	A10-9600P	Celeron G3950
MSRP	$128	$52-59%
Performance per Dollar	18.2	44.9+147%
Release Date	2016	2017

Search A10-9600P on Amazon

Search Celeron G3950 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.