A10-9600P vs Core i3-3240
A10-9600P
Core i3-3240
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-9600P is positioned at rank 572 and the Core i3-3240 is on rank 847, so the A10-9600P offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A10-9600P
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3240
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A10-9600P | Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A10-9600P | Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+236%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10-9600P and Core i3-3240
A10-9600P
The A10-9600P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,333 points. Launch price was $130.
Core i3-3240
The Core i3-3240 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,352 points. Launch price was $75.
Processing Power
The A10-9600P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-3240 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-9600P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the A10-9600P versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-3240 — a 3% clock advantage for the Core i3-3240 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The A10-9600P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-3240 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9600P scores 2,333 against the Core i3-3240's 2,352 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-3240.
| Feature | A10-9600P | Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz+42% |
| L3 Cache | — | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | 22 nm-21% |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,333 | 2,352 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 469 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A10-9600P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-3240 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | A10-9600P | Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-1866 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-9600P) / not specified (Core i3-3240). The A10-9600P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5), while the Core i3-3240 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9600P targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-9600P rivals Core i3-6006U.
| Feature | A10-9600P | Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R5 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Laptop | — |
Value Analysis
The A10-9600P launched at $128 MSRP, while the Core i3-3240 debuted at $132. At current prices ($50 vs $15), the Core i3-3240 is $35 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-9600P delivers 46.7 pts/$ vs 156.8 pts/$ for the Core i3-3240 — making the Core i3-3240 the 108.3% better value option.
| Feature | A10-9600P | Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $128-3% | $132 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $15-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.7 | 156.8+236% |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A10-9600P and Core i3-3240
