A10-9600P vs Core m5-6Y57
A10-9600P
Core m5-6Y57
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-9600P is positioned at rank 572 and the Core m5-6Y57 is on rank 1123, so the A10-9600P offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A10-9600P
Performance Per Dollar Core m5-6Y57
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A10-9600P | Core m5-6Y57 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($50) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake-Y (2015) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A10-9600P | Core m5-6Y57 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+460%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($50) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10-9600P and Core m5-6Y57
A10-9600P
The A10-9600P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,333 points. Launch price was $130.
Core m5-6Y57
The Core m5-6Y57 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,342 points. Launch price was $281.
Processing Power
The A10-9600P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core m5-6Y57 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-9600P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the A10-9600P versus 2.8 GHz on the Core m5-6Y57 — a 16.4% clock advantage for the A10-9600P (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A10-9600P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core m5-6Y57 uses Skylake-Y (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9600P scores 2,333 against the Core m5-6Y57's 2,342 — a 0.4% lead for the Core m5-6Y57.
| Feature | A10-9600P | Core m5-6Y57 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz+18% | 2.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+118% | 1.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | 14 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Skylake-Y (2015) |
| PassMark | 2,333 | 2,342 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 469 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A10-9600P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core m5-6Y57 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | A10-9600P | Core m5-6Y57 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | FCBGA1515 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-1866 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-9600P) / not specified (Core m5-6Y57). The A10-9600P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5), while the Core m5-6Y57 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9600P targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-9600P rivals Core i3-6006U.
| Feature | A10-9600P | Core m5-6Y57 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R5 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Laptop | — |
Value Analysis
The A10-9600P launched at $128 MSRP, while the Core m5-6Y57 debuted at $281. At current prices ($50 vs $281), the A10-9600P is $231 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-9600P delivers 46.7 pts/$ vs 8.3 pts/$ for the Core m5-6Y57 — making the A10-9600P the 139.4% better value option.
| Feature | A10-9600P | Core m5-6Y57 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $128-54% | $281 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-82% | $281 |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.7+463% | 8.3 |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2015 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A10-9600P and Core m5-6Y57
