A10-9600P vs Core m5-6Y57

A10-9600P vs Core m5-6Y57 Performance Spectrum

A10-9600P

4 / 4

2,333

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core m5-6Y57

2 / 4

2,342

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-9600P vs Core m5-6Y57 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-9600P vs Core m5-6Y57: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-9600P

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $153 less on MSRP ($128 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Delivers 118.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.2 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Draws 2W instead of 5W, a 3W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R5, while Core m5-6Y57 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,333 vs 2,342).

Core m5-6Y57

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 18.2 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).
❌125% higher power demand at 4.5W vs 2W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-9600P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-9600P better than Core m5-6Y57?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-9600P is ahead with a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core m5-6Y57 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core m5-6Y57 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-9600P is the better buy right now. A10-9600P comes in $153 cheaper on MSRP at $128 MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core m5-6Y57 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.4% better PassMark. It is also 118.7% better value on MSRP (18.2 vs 8.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-9600P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-9600P vs Core m5-6Y57 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-9600P

The A10-9600P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,333 points. Launch price was $130.

Core m5-6Y57

The Core m5-6Y57 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,342 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-9600P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core m5-6Y57 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-9600P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the A10-9600P versus 2.8 GHz on the Core m5-6Y57 — a 16.4% clock advantage for the A10-9600P (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A10-9600P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core m5-6Y57 uses Skylake-Y (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9600P scores 2,333 against the Core m5-6Y57's 2,342 — a 0.4% lead for the Core m5-6Y57.

Feature	A10-9600P	Core m5-6Y57
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+18%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+118%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Skylake-Y (2015)
PassMark	2,333	2,342
Geekbench 6 Single	469	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-9600P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core m5-6Y57 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-9600P	Core m5-6Y57
Socket	FP4	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-9600P) / not specified (Core m5-6Y57). The A10-9600P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5), while the Core m5-6Y57 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9600P targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-9600P rivals Core i3-6006U.

Feature	A10-9600P	Core m5-6Y57
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Radeon R5	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Laptop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A10-9600P was priced at $128, while the Core m5-6Y57 came in at $281. On launch pricing ($128 vs $281), A10-9600P was $153 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-9600P delivers 18.2 pts/$ vs 8.3 pts/$ for the Core m5-6Y57 — making the A10-9600P the 74.5% better value option.

Feature	A10-9600P	Core m5-6Y57
MSRP	$128-54%	$281
Performance per Dollar	18.2+119%	8.3
Release Date	2016	2015

Search A10-9600P on Amazon

Search Core m5-6Y57 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.