A10-9600P
VS
Core i7-3537U

A10-9600P vs Core i7-3537U

AMD

A10-9600P

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Core i7-3537U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-9600P is positioned at rank 572 and the Core i7-3537U is on rank 1165, so the A10-9600P offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10-9600P

#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
99%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
99%
#560
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
755%
#561
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
744%
#562
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
683%
#563
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
680%
#564
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
673%
#566
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
650%
#567
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
623%
#568
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
622%
#569
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
606%
#572
A10-9600P
MSRP: $128|Avg: $50
100%
#583
Processor N100
MSRP: $128|Avg: $100
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3537U

#1153
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4321%
#1154
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4258%
#1155
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3909%
#1156
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3891%
#1157
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3855%
#1159
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3723%
#1160
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3570%
#1161
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3564%
#1162
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3468%
#1165
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
100%
#1166
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1167
Core M-5Y10c
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1168
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
100%
#1170
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
99%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
98%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
98%
#1176
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
96%
#1177
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
96%
#1178
Athlon PRO 3045B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $180
96%
#1179
Core 2 Duo T5600
MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A
95%
#1180
Pentium N3510
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A10-9600P leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-3537U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA10-9600PCore i7-3537U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($50)
⚠️ Higher cost ($346)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the A10-9600P stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 86% cheaper ($50 vs $346) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightA10-9600PCore i7-3537U
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+587%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($50)
⚠️ Higher cost ($346)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10-9600P and Core i7-3537U

AMD

A10-9600P

The A10-9600P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,333 points. Launch price was $130.

Intel

Core i7-3537U

The Core i7-3537U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,349 points. Launch price was $346.

Processing Power

The A10-9600P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-3537U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-9600P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the A10-9600P versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-3537U — a 6.2% clock advantage for the A10-9600P (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A10-9600P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-3537U uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9600P scores 2,333 against the Core i7-3537U's 2,349 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-3537U.

FeatureA10-9600PCore i7-3537U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz+6%
3.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+20%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2048 kB+700%
256K (per core)
Process
28 nm
22 nm-21%
Architecture
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,333
2,349
Geekbench 6 Single
469
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-9600P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3537U uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the A10-9600P versus 1600 on the Core i7-3537U — the Core i7-3537U supports 199% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-3537U supports up to 32 of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A10-9600P) vs 16 (Core i7-3537U) — the Core i7-3537U offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureA10-9600PCore i7-3537U
Socket
FP4
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-1866
1600+39900%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+52428700%
32
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-9600P) vs true (Core i7-3537U). Both include integrated graphics Radeon R5 (A10-9600P) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3537U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9600P targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-9600P rivals Core i3-6006U; Core i7-3537U rivals AMD A10-4655M.

FeatureA10-9600PCore i7-3537U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R5
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
true
Target Use
Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

The A10-9600P launched at $128 MSRP, while the Core i7-3537U debuted at $346.

FeatureA10-9600PCore i7-3537U
MSRP
$128-63%
$346
Avg Price (30d)
$50
Release Date
2016
2013