A10-9600P
VS
Core i7-860S

A10-9600P vs Core i7-860S

AMD

A10-9600P

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Core i7-860S

4 Cores8 Thrd82 WWMax: 3.46 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-9600P is positioned at rank 572 and the Core i7-860S is on rank 1033, so the A10-9600P offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10-9600P

#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
99%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
99%
#560
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
755%
#561
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
744%
#562
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
683%
#563
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
680%
#564
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
673%
#566
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
650%
#567
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
623%
#568
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
622%
#569
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
606%
#572
A10-9600P
MSRP: $128|Avg: $50
100%
#583
Processor N100
MSRP: $128|Avg: $100
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-860S

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
40118%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
37907%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
27524%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
8292%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6568%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5746%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3291%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3248%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2957%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2957%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2924%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2845%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2805%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2794%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2769%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
99%
#1033
Core i7-860S
MSRP: $299|Avg: $96
100%
#1035
PRO A10-8770E
MSRP: $395|Avg: $210
98%
#1036
Core 2 Duo E4700
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
98%
#1037
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
MSRP: $230|Avg: $20
98%
#1038
Phenom II X2 B53
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
98%
#1039
Core 2 Quad Q9300
MSRP: $266|Avg: $27
97%
#1040
Core 2 Duo E7200
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
97%
#1041
Athlon II X4 638
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
97%
#1043
Phenom X3 8750
MSRP: $195|Avg: $20
95%
#1044
Pentium G4400TE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
94%
#1045
Celeron 2.60
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
93%
#1046
Core i7-990X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $225
92%
#1047
Phenom X4 9750B
MSRP: $215|Avg: $34
91%
#1048
Core 2 Duo E8200
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A10-9600P (2016) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA10-9600PCore i7-860S
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($50)
⚠️ Higher cost ($96)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-860S (2010) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA10-9600PCore i7-860S
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+93%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($50)
⚠️ Higher cost ($96)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10-9600P and Core i7-860S

AMD

A10-9600P

The A10-9600P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,333 points. Launch price was $130.

Intel

Core i7-860S

The Core i7-860S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 82 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,324 points. Launch price was $422.

Processing Power

The A10-9600P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-860S's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the A10-9600P versus 3.46 GHz on the Core i7-860S — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-860S (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The A10-9600P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-860S uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9600P scores 2,333 against the Core i7-860S's 2,324 — a 0.4% lead for the A10-9600P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 469 vs 451, a 3.9% lead for the A10-9600P that directly translates to higher frame rates.

FeatureA10-9600PCore i7-860S
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
3.46 GHz+5%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
2.53 GHz+5%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2048 kB+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm-38%
45 nm
Architecture
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Lynnfield (2009−2010)
PassMark
2,333
2,324
Geekbench 6 Single
469+4%
451
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,332
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-9600P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-860S uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the A10-9600P versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-860S — the A10-9600P supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A10-9600P) vs 16 (Core i7-860S) — the Core i7-860S offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureA10-9600PCore i7-860S
Socket
FP4
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-1866+33%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-9600P) vs Yes (Core i7-860S). The A10-9600P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5), while the Core i7-860S requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9600P targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-9600P rivals Core i3-6006U.

FeatureA10-9600PCore i7-860S
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon R5
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Yes
Target Use
Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

The A10-9600P launched at $128 MSRP, while the Core i7-860S debuted at $299. At current prices ($50 vs $96), the A10-9600P is $46 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-9600P delivers 46.7 pts/$ vs 24.2 pts/$ for the Core i7-860S — making the A10-9600P the 63.4% better value option.

FeatureA10-9600PCore i7-860S
MSRP
$128-57%
$299
Avg Price (30d)
$50-48%
$96
Performance per Dollar
46.7+93%
24.2
Release Date
2016
2010