PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3950 vs Core i7-1060G7 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3950 vs Core i7-1060G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3950

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-1060G7 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $52 MSRP, while Core i7-1060G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌466.7% higher power demand at 51W vs 9W.

Core i7-1060G7

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 9W instead of 51W, a 42W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,322 vs 2,336).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-1060G7 better than Celeron G3950?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-1060G7 is ahead with a 6.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3950 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. Core i7-1060G7 also has the bigger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3950 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-1060G7 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-1060G7 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $52 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G3950 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (44.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-1060G7 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and 300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G3950 vs Core i7-1060G7 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3950

The Celeron G3950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,336 points. Launch price was $52.

Core i7-1060G7

The Core i7-1060G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 2,322 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G3950 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i7-1060G7 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-1060G7 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Celeron G3950 versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-1060G7 — a 23.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-1060G7 (base: 3 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Celeron G3950 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-1060G7 uses Ice Lake (Client) (2019) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3950 scores 2,336 against the Core i7-1060G7's 2,322 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G3950. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 750 vs 1,523, a 68% lead for the Core i7-1060G7 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G3950 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-1060G7.

Feature	Celeron G3950	Core i7-1060G7
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.8 GHz+27%
Base Clock	3 GHz+200%	1 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+300%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Ice Lake (Client) (2019)
PassMark	2,336	2,322
Geekbench 6 Single	750	1,523+103%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,100	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3950 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-1060G7 uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G3950 versus LPDDR4-3733 on the Core i7-1060G7 — the Core i7-1060G7 supports 55.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3950 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3950) and Ice Lake-Y (Core i7-1060G7).

Feature	Celeron G3950	Core i7-1060G7
Socket	LGA1151	BGA1440
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	LPDDR4-3733+56%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i7-1060G7 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G3950) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-1060G7). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 610 (Celeron G3950) and Iris Plus Graphics (Core i7-1060G7) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3950 targets Budget, Core i7-1060G7 targets Premium Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Celeron G3950 rivals Pentium G4560; Core i7-1060G7 rivals Ryzen 7 4700U.

Feature	Celeron G3950	Core i7-1060G7
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 610	Iris Plus Graphics
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Budget	Premium Ultrabook