Celeron G3950 vs Pentium G4400T

Intel

Celeron G3950

2 Cores2 Thrd51 WWMax: 3 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium G4400T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······

Celeron G3950 vs Pentium G4400T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3950 vs Pentium G4400T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3950 vs Pentium G4400T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3950

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $12 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
  • Delivers 23.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 36.3 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 610, while Pentium G4400T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
  • 45.7% higher power demand at 51W vs 35W.

Pentium G4400T

2015

Why buy it

  • +50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
  • Draws 35W instead of 51W, a 16W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,323 vs 2,336).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 36.3 vs 44.9 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).
  • No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3950 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3950 better than Pentium G4400T?
Yes. Celeron G3950 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Celeron G3950 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3950 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron G3950 is the better buy right now. Celeron G3950 comes in $12 cheaper on MSRP at $52 MSRP versus $64 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 23.8% better value on MSRP (44.9 vs 36.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G3950 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G3950 vs Pentium G4400T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron G3950

The Celeron G3950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,336 points. Launch price was $52.

Intel

Pentium G4400T

The Pentium G4400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,323 points. Launch price was $64.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G3950 and Pentium G4400T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Celeron G3950 versus 2.9 GHz on the Pentium G4400T — a 3.4% clock advantage for the Celeron G3950 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Celeron G3950 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium G4400T uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3950 scores 2,336 against the Pentium G4400T's 2,323 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G3950. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G3950 vs 3 MB on the Pentium G4400T.

FeatureCeleron G3950Pentium G4400T
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3 GHz+3%
2.9 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+3%
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
3 MB+50%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
2,336
2,323
Geekbench 6 Single
750
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,100
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1151 socket with PCIe 3.0.

FeatureCeleron G3950Pentium G4400T
Socket
LGA1151
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G3950) / not specified (Pentium G4400T). The Celeron G3950 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Pentium G4400T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3950 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3950 rivals Pentium G4560.

FeatureCeleron G3950Pentium G4400T
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G3950 was priced at $52, while the Pentium G4400T came in at $64. On launch pricing ($52 vs $64), Celeron G3950 was $12 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3950 delivers 44.9 pts/$ vs 36.3 pts/$ for the Pentium G4400T — making the Celeron G3950 the 21.2% better value option.

FeatureCeleron G3950Pentium G4400T
MSRP
$52-19%
$64
Performance per Dollar
44.9+24%
36.3
Release Date
2017
2015

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.