Celeron G4930 vs Xeon X3380

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4930 vs Xeon X3380 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4930 vs Xeon X3380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4930

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 54W instead of 95W, a 41W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Xeon X3380 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X3380 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,551 vs 2,568).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Xeon X3380 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon X3380

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌75.9% higher power demand at 95W vs 54W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4930 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X3380 better than Celeron G4930?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X3380 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron G4930 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X3380 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X3380 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark. It also has the larger cache pool with 500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X3380 is still the better call for a fresh build. Xeon X3380 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G4930 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 2,551 PassMark with 2 cores and 2 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4930 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G4930 vs Xeon X3380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4930

The Celeron G4930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,551 points. Launch price was $42.

Xeon X3380

The Xeon X3380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3.16 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,568 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G4930 is built on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G4930 scores 2,551 against the Xeon X3380's 2,568 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon X3380. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G4930 vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X3380.

Feature	Celeron G4930	Xeon X3380
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	—
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+1%	3.16 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	12 MB L2 Cache+500%
L2 Cache	512 kB	—
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	—
PassMark	2,551	2,568
Geekbench 6 Single	672	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,229	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4930 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X3380 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G4930	Xeon X3380
Socket	LGA1151	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G4930) / not specified (Xeon X3380). The Celeron G4930 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Xeon X3380 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4930 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4930 rivals Pentium G5420.