
Celeron G530

Core i5-13400F
Celeron G530 vs Core i5-13400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G530 vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G530 vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G530
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $154 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (663 vs 11,408).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.3 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1155, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +633.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+900% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Delivers 367.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 27.3 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1155 and older memory support.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌366.7% HIGHER MSRP$196 MSRPvs$42 MSRP
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G530 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Celeron G530?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G530 vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G530
The Celeron G530 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,148 points. Launch price was $50.

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The Celeron G530 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G530 versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 62.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron G530 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G530 scores 1,148 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 182.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 379 vs 2,407, a 145.6% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 663 vs 11,408 (178% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G530 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Celeron G530 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 10 / 16+400% |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 4.6 GHz+92% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+900% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% |
| Process | 32 nm | Intel 7 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 1,148 | 25,029+2080% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,211 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 379 | 2,407+535% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 663 | 11,408+1621% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G530 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G530 versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 350.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G530) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G530) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).
| Feature | Celeron G530 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 5.0+150% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+350% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 192 GB+500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G530) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). The Celeron G530 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G530 targets Budget, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Celeron G530 rivals Pentium G630; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Celeron G530 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Budget | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G530 was priced at $42, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($42 vs $196), Celeron G530 was $154 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G530 delivers 27.3 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 129.5% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G530 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $42-79% | $196 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.3 | 127.7+368% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














