Celeron G530 vs Pentium E6800

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G530 vs Pentium E6800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G530 vs Pentium E6800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G530

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $44 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅Delivers 103.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.3 vs 13.4 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Pentium E6800 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,148 vs 1,155).

Pentium E6800

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.4 vs 27.3 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G530 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G530 better than Pentium E6800?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G530 is ahead with a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium E6800 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium E6800 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G530 is the better buy right now. Celeron G530 comes in $44 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Pentium E6800 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 103.5% better value on MSRP (27.3 vs 13.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G530 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G530 vs Pentium E6800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G530

The Celeron G530 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,148 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium E6800

The Pentium E6800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,155 points. Launch price was $831.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G530 and Pentium E6800 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G530 versus 0.33 GHz on the Pentium E6800 — a 151.6% clock advantage for the Celeron G530 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The Celeron G530 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium E6800 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G530 scores 1,148 against the Pentium E6800's 1,155 — a 0.6% lead for the Pentium E6800. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G530 vs 0 kB on the Pentium E6800.

Feature	Celeron G530	Pentium E6800
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+627%	0.33 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.33 GHz+39%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2 MB (total)+700%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,148	1,155
Geekbench 6 Single	379	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	663	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G530 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium E6800 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G530	Pentium E6800
Socket	LGA1155	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G530) / not specified (Pentium E6800). The Celeron G530 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium E6800 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G530 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G530 rivals Pentium G630.

Feature	Celeron G530	Pentium E6800
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G530 was priced at $42, while the Pentium E6800 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($42 vs $86), Celeron G530 was $44 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G530 delivers 27.3 pts/$ vs 13.4 pts/$ for the Pentium E6800 — making the Celeron G530 the 68.2% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G530	Pentium E6800
MSRP	$42-51%	$86
Performance per Dollar	27.3+104%	13.4
Release Date	2011	2010

Search Celeron G530 on Amazon

Search Pentium E6800 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.