PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G460 vs Celeron G530 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G460 vs Celeron G530: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G460

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $5 less on MSRP ($37 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
✅Delivers 13.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.9 vs 27.3 PassMark/$ ($37 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (300 vs 379).
❌Lower PassMark (1,145 vs 1,148).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 2 MB).

Celeron G530

2011

Why buy it

✅+26.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.3 vs 30.9 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $37 MSRP).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G530 better than Celeron G460?

Yes. Celeron G530 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G530 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G530 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G530 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron G530 comes in 13.5% more expensive on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $37 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G460 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 13.2% better value on paper (30.9 vs 27.3 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G530 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 33.3% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1.5 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G460 vs Celeron G530 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G460

The Celeron G460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 December 2011 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,145 points. Launch price was $65.

Celeron G530

The Celeron G530 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,148 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G460 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron G530 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron G530 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron G460 versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G530 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Celeron G530 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). Both are built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron G460 scores 1,145 against the Celeron G530's 1,148 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron G530. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 300 vs 379, a 23.3% lead for the Celeron G530 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 1.5 MB on the Celeron G460 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G530.

Feature	Celeron G460	Celeron G530
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.4 GHz+33%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.4 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	1.5 MB	2 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,145	1,148
Geekbench 6 Single	300	379+26%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	663

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1155 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G460) and H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G530).

Feature	Celeron G460	Celeron G530
Socket	LGA1155	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G460) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G530) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G460 targets Budget, Celeron G530 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G460 rivals Pentium G630; Celeron G530 rivals Pentium G630.

Feature	Celeron G460	Celeron G530
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G460 was priced at $37, while the Celeron G530 came in at $42. On launch pricing ($37 vs $42), Celeron G460 was $5 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G460 delivers 30.9 pts/$ vs 27.3 pts/$ for the Celeron G530 — making the Celeron G460 the 12.4% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G460	Celeron G530
MSRP	$37-12%	$42
Performance per Dollar	30.9+13%	27.3
Release Date	2011	2011

Search Celeron G460 on Amazon

Search Celeron G530 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.