Celeron G460
VS
Celeron J1900

Celeron G460 vs Celeron J1900

Intel

Celeron G460

1 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Celeron J1900

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.42 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G460 is positioned at rank 586 and the Celeron J1900 is on rank 216, so the Celeron J1900 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G460

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10072%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9517%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6910%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2082%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1649%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1442%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
826%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
815%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
742%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
742%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
734%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
714%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
704%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
701%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
695%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
99%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
98%
#586
Celeron G460
MSRP: $37|Avg: $10
100%
#587
A4 PRO-7350B
MSRP: $50|Avg: $11
100%
#589
Pentium G3220T
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
99%
#590
Celeron G1620
MSRP: $52|Avg: $40
99%
#591
Core i5-7600T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $60
98%
#593
Core i3-7300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $128
97%
#594
Celeron G1830
MSRP: $52|Avg: $5
97%
#596
Core i3-4160
MSRP: $117|Avg: $52
97%
#598
FX-8350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $130
96%
#599
Athlon X4 760K
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
96%
#600
Core i5-6400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $57
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron J1900

#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
98%
#204
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
382%
#205
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
376%
#206
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
346%
#207
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
344%
#208
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
341%
#210
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
329%
#211
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
316%
#212
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
315%
#213
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
307%
#216
Celeron J1900
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron J1900 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron G460 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron G460Celeron J1900
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-D (2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron G460Celeron J1900
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G460 and Celeron J1900

Intel

Celeron G460

The Celeron G460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 December 2011 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,145 points. Launch price was $65.

Intel

Celeron J1900

The Celeron J1900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.42 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,152 points. Launch price was $82.

Processing Power

The Celeron G460 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron J1900 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J1900 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron G460 versus 2.42 GHz on the Celeron J1900 — a 29.4% clock advantage for the Celeron J1900 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron G460 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron J1900 uses Bay Trail-D (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G460 scores 1,145 against the Celeron J1900's 1,152 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron J1900. L3 cache: 1.5 MB on the Celeron G460 vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1900.

FeatureCeleron G460Celeron J1900
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
4 / 4+300%
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
2.42 GHz+34%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
2 GHz+11%
L3 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB L2 Cache+33%
L2 Cache
256 kB
2 MB+700%
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Bay Trail-D (2013)
PassMark
1,145
1,152
Geekbench 6 Single
300
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G460 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron J1900 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Celeron G460 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G460) vs 4 (Celeron J1900) — the Celeron G460 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G460) and Bay Trail SoC (Celeron J1900).

FeatureCeleron G460Celeron J1900
Socket
LGA1155
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR3L-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+300%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+300%
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G460) / not specified (Celeron J1900). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G460) and Intel HD Graphics (Celeron J1900) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G460 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G460 rivals Pentium G630.

FeatureCeleron G460Celeron J1900
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget