Celeron G460 vs Celeron J1900

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G460 vs Celeron J1900 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G460 vs Celeron J1900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G460

2011

Why buy it

✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,145 vs 1,152).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 2 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $37 MSRP, while Celeron J1900 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1650% higher power demand at 35W vs 2W.

Celeron J1900

2013

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1.5 MB).
✅Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J1900 better than Celeron G460?

Yes. Celeron J1900 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron J1900 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J1900 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron J1900 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron J1900 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $37 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G460 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (30.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J1900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1.5 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G460 vs Celeron J1900 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G460

The Celeron G460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 December 2011 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,145 points. Launch price was $65.

Celeron J1900

The Celeron J1900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.42 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,152 points. Launch price was $82.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G460 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron J1900 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J1900 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron G460 versus 2.42 GHz on the Celeron J1900 — a 29.4% clock advantage for the Celeron J1900 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron G460 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron J1900 uses Bay Trail-D (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G460 scores 1,145 against the Celeron J1900's 1,152 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron J1900. L3 cache: 1.5 MB on the Celeron G460 vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1900.

Feature	Celeron G460	Celeron J1900
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	4 / 4+300%
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.42 GHz+34%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	1.5 MB	2 MB L2 Cache+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB	2 MB+700%
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Bay Trail-D (2013)
PassMark	1,145	1,152
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G460 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron J1900 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G460 versus DDR3L-1333 on the Celeron J1900 — the Celeron J1900 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G460 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G460) vs 4 (Celeron J1900) — the Celeron G460 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G460) and Bay Trail SoC (Celeron J1900).

Feature	Celeron G460	Celeron J1900
Socket	LGA1155	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	DDR3L-1333+25%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+300%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+300%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G460) / not specified (Celeron J1900). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G460) and Intel HD Graphics (Celeron J1900) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G460 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G460 rivals Pentium G630.