
Celeron G460

Pentium N3520
Celeron G460 vs Pentium N3520 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G460 vs Pentium N3520 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G460 vs Pentium N3520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G460
2011Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $63 less on MSRP ($37 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 170.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.9 vs 11.4 PassMark/$ ($37 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Pentium N3520 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 2 MB).
- ❌1650% higher power demand at 35W vs 2W.
Pentium N3520
2013Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1.5 MB).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,144 vs 1,145).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 30.9 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $37 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G460 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium N3520 better than Celeron G460?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G460 vs Pentium N3520 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G460
The Celeron G460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 December 2011 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,145 points. Launch price was $65.

Pentium N3520
The Pentium N3520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.17 GHz, with boost up to 2.42 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,144 points. Launch price was $161.
Processing Power
The Celeron G460 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium N3520 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium N3520 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron G460 versus 2.42 GHz on the Pentium N3520 — a 29.4% clock advantage for the Pentium N3520 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.17 GHz). The Celeron G460 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium N3520 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G460 scores 1,145 against the Pentium N3520's 1,144 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G460. L3 cache: 1.5 MB on the Celeron G460 vs 2 MB on the Pentium N3520.
| Feature | Celeron G460 | Pentium N3520 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 2 | 4 / 4+300% |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.42 GHz+34% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.17 GHz+21% |
| L3 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB | 2 MB+700% |
| Process | 32 nm | 22 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 1,145 | 1,144 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 300 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G460 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium N3520 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron G460 | Pentium N3520 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | FCBGA1170 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G460) / not specified (Pentium N3520). The Celeron G460 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium N3520 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G460 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G460 rivals Pentium G630.
| Feature | Celeron G460 | Pentium N3520 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G460 was priced at $37, while the Pentium N3520 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($37 vs $100), Celeron G460 was $63 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G460 delivers 30.9 pts/$ vs 11.4 pts/$ for the Pentium N3520 — making the Celeron G460 the 92% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G460 | Pentium N3520 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $37-63% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.9+171% | 11.4 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














