A4-3300 vs Celeron G460

A4-3300 vs Celeron G460 Performance Spectrum

A4-3300

2 / 2

1,143

0.0%

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G460

1 / 1

1,145

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-3300 vs Celeron G460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-3300 vs Celeron G460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-3300

2011

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron G460.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (266 vs 300).
❌Lower PassMark (1,143 vs 1,145).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Celeron G460

2011

Why buy it

✅+12.8% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $37 MSRP, while A4-3300 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A4-3300.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G460 better than A4-3300?

Yes. Celeron G460 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G460 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G460 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G460 is the better buy right now. Celeron G460 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $37 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (30.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G460 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

A4-3300 vs Celeron G460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-3300

The A4-3300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,143 points. Launch price was $50.

Celeron G460

The Celeron G460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 December 2011 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,145 points. Launch price was $65.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-3300 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron G460 offers 1 cores / 2 threads — the A4-3300 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A4-3300 versus 1.8 GHz on the Celeron G460 — a 32.6% clock advantage for the A4-3300 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The A4-3300 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G460 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-3300 scores 1,143 against the Celeron G460's 1,145 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron G460. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 266 vs 300, a 12% lead for the Celeron G460 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-3300 vs 1.5 MB on the Celeron G460.

Feature	A4-3300	Celeron G460
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 2
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+39%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+39%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	1.5 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256 kB
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,143	1,145
Geekbench 6 Single	266	300+13%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-3300 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G460 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A4-3300 versus DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G460 — the A4-3300 supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G460 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75 (A4-3300) and H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G460).

Feature	A4-3300	Celeron G460
Socket	FM1	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+50%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-3300) vs VT-x (Celeron G460). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 6410D (A4-3300) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G460) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-3300 targets Budget Desktop, Celeron G460 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A4-3300 rivals Celeron G530; Celeron G460 rivals Pentium G630.