A4-3300 vs Pentium G640T

A4-3300 vs Pentium G640T Performance Spectrum

A4-3300

2 / 2

1,143

+0.4%

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium G640T

2 / 2

1,139

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-3300 vs Pentium G640T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-3300 vs Pentium G640T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-3300

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6410D, while Pentium G640T needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium G640T.

Trade-offs

❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Pentium G640T

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A4-3300 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,139 vs 1,143).
❌Launch MSRP is still $64 MSRP, while A4-3300 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-3300 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A4-3300.

Quick Answers

So, is A4-3300 better than Pentium G640T?

Yes. A4-3300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A4-3300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4-3300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-3300 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A4-3300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $64 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium G640T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (17.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium G640T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-3300 vs Pentium G640T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-3300

The A4-3300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,143 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium G640T

The Pentium G640T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,139 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A4-3300 and Pentium G640T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A4-3300 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium G640T — a 4.1% clock advantage for the A4-3300 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The A4-3300 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium G640T uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-3300 scores 1,143 against the Pentium G640T's 1,139 — a 0.4% lead for the A4-3300. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-3300 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G640T.

Feature	A4-3300	Pentium G640T
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+4%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+4%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,143	1,139
Geekbench 6 Single	266	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-3300 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G640T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A4-3300	Pentium G640T
Socket	FM1	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-3300) / not specified (Pentium G640T). The A4-3300 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6410D), while the Pentium G640T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-3300 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-3300 rivals Celeron G530.