A4-3300 vs Celeron G530

A4-3300 vs Celeron G530 Performance Spectrum

A4-3300

2 / 2

1,143

0.0%

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G530

2 / 2

1,148

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-3300 vs Celeron G530 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-3300 vs Celeron G530: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-3300

2011

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron G530.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (266 vs 379).
❌Lower PassMark (1,143 vs 1,148).

Celeron G530

2011

Why buy it

✅+42.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while A4-3300 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A4-3300.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G530 better than A4-3300?

Yes. Celeron G530 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G530 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G530 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G530 is the better buy right now. Celeron G530 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (27.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G530 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4-3300 vs Celeron G530 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-3300

The A4-3300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,143 points. Launch price was $50.

Celeron G530

The Celeron G530 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,148 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A4-3300 and Celeron G530 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A4-3300 versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G530 — a 4.1% clock advantage for the A4-3300 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The A4-3300 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G530 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-3300 scores 1,143 against the Celeron G530's 1,148 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G530. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 266 vs 379, a 35% lead for the Celeron G530 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-3300 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G530.

Feature	A4-3300	Celeron G530
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+4%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+4%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,143	1,148
Geekbench 6 Single	266	379+42%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	663

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-3300 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G530 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A4-3300 versus DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G530 — the A4-3300 supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G530 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75 (A4-3300) and H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G530).

Feature	A4-3300	Celeron G530
Socket	FM1	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+50%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-3300) vs VT-x (Celeron G530). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 6410D (A4-3300) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G530) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-3300 targets Budget Desktop, Celeron G530 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A4-3300 rivals Celeron G530; Celeron G530 rivals Pentium G630.