A4-3300
VS
Pentium N3520

A4-3300 vs Pentium N3520

AMD

A4-3300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Pentium N3520

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.42 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A4-3300 is positioned at rank 814 and the Pentium N3520 is on rank 1046, so the A4-3300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A4-3300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16363%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15461%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11226%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3382%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2679%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2344%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1342%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1325%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1206%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1206%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1193%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1160%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1144%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1140%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1129%
#814
A4-3300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#815
Core i3-3210
MSRP: $117|Avg: $25
100%
#816
Celeron G3900E
MSRP: $107|Avg: $35
100%
#817
Athlon II X3 435
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#818
Core i7-6822EQ
MSRP: $294|Avg: $190
99%
#819
Athlon II X4 645
MSRP: $126|Avg: $20
99%
#820
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
98%
#821
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#822
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
98%
#823
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
97%
#824
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
97%
#825
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
97%
#827
Core i7-6850K
MSRP: $617|Avg: $80
97%
#828
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
97%
#829
Pentium G3430
MSRP: $116|Avg: $30
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium N3520

#1034
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2565%
#1035
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2527%
#1036
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2320%
#1037
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2309%
#1038
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2288%
#1040
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2210%
#1041
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2119%
#1042
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2115%
#1043
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2059%
#1046
Pentium N3520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
100%
#1047
E2-3800
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#1048
Athlon X2 QL-66
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
99%
#1049
Athlon II Neo K145
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#1050
Celeron P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#1051
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1052
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
97%
#1053
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
97%
#1054
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
96%
#1056
Athlon X2 QL-65
MSRP: $150|Avg: $22
95%
#1057
Pentium J2850
MSRP: $94|Avg: $94
94%
#1058
Core i7-4900MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $40
94%
#1059
Pentium Dual Core T2370
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
93%
#1060
Celeron P4505
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
93%
#1061
Pentium T4200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A4-3300 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium N3520 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA4-3300Pentium N3520
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA4-3300Pentium N3520
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A4-3300 and Pentium N3520

AMD

A4-3300

The A4-3300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,143 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Pentium N3520

The Pentium N3520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.17 GHz, with boost up to 2.42 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,144 points. Launch price was $161.

Processing Power

The A4-3300 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium N3520 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium N3520 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A4-3300 versus 2.42 GHz on the Pentium N3520 — a 3.3% clock advantage for the A4-3300 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.17 GHz). The A4-3300 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium N3520 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A4-3300 scores 1,143 against the Pentium N3520's 1,144 — a 0.1% lead for the Pentium N3520. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-3300 vs 2 MB on the Pentium N3520.

FeatureA4-3300Pentium N3520
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz+3%
2.42 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+15%
2.17 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
2 MB+300%
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Llano (2011−2012)
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,143
1,144
Geekbench 6 Single
266
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-3300 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium N3520 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA4-3300Pentium N3520
Socket
FM1
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-3300) / not specified (Pentium N3520). The A4-3300 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6410D), while the Pentium N3520 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-3300 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-3300 rivals Celeron G530.

FeatureA4-3300Pentium N3520
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6410D
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Desktop