A4-3300 vs Athlon II X2 245e

A4-3300 vs Athlon II X2 245e Performance Spectrum

A4-3300

2 / 2

1,143

+0.2%

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon II X2 245e

2 / 2

1,141

0.0%

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-3300 vs Athlon II X2 245e FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-3300 vs Athlon II X2 245e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-3300

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6410D, while Athlon II X2 245e needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Athlon II X2 245e.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (266 vs 319).
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Athlon II X2 245e

2010

Why buy it

✅+19.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,141 vs 1,143).
❌Launch MSRP is still $87 MSRP, while A4-3300 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-3300 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A4-3300.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X2 245e better than A4-3300?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II X2 245e is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A4-3300 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4-3300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II X2 245e is the better buy right now. Athlon II X2 245e comes in at an unclear MSRP at $87 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that A4-3300 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-3300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4-3300 vs Athlon II X2 245e Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-3300

The A4-3300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,143 points. Launch price was $50.

Athlon II X2 245e

The Athlon II X2 245e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,141 points. Launch price was $80.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A4-3300 and Athlon II X2 245e share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A4-3300 versus 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X2 245e — a 14.8% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 245e (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A4-3300 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X2 245e uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A4-3300 scores 1,143 against the Athlon II X2 245e's 1,141 — a 0.2% lead for the A4-3300. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 266 vs 319, a 18.1% lead for the Athlon II X2 245e that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A4-3300	Athlon II X2 245e
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	2.9 GHz+16%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.9 GHz+16%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB+100%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Regor (2009−2013)
PassMark	1,143	1,141
Geekbench 6 Single	266	319+20%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	741

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-3300 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X2 245e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A4-3300 versus DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X2 245e — the A4-3300 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75 (A4-3300) and 760G,770,780G,785G,790FX,790GX (Athlon II X2 245e).

Feature	A4-3300	Athlon II X2 245e
Socket	FM1	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A4-3300 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6410D), while the Athlon II X2 245e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-3300 targets Budget Desktop, Athlon II X2 245e targets Budget. Direct competitor: A4-3300 rivals Celeron G530; Athlon II X2 245e rivals Athlon II X2 270u.