PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G460 vs Core 2 Duo E8200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G460 vs Core 2 Duo E8200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G460

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $126 less on MSRP ($37 MSRP vs $163 MSRP).
✅Delivers 340.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.9 vs 7.0 PassMark/$ ($37 MSRP vs $163 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (300 vs 350).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E8200.

Core 2 Duo E8200

2008

Why buy it

✅+16.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Celeron G460.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,144 vs 1,145).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 30.9 PassMark/$ ($163 MSRP vs $37 MSRP).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G460 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G460 better than Core 2 Duo E8200?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 2 Duo E8200 is ahead with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G460 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G460 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G460 is the better buy right now. Celeron G460 comes in $126 cheaper on MSRP at $37 MSRP versus $163 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core 2 Duo E8200 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 340.9% better value on MSRP (30.9 vs 7.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G460 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G460 vs Core 2 Duo E8200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G460

The Celeron G460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 December 2011 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,145 points. Launch price was $65.

Core 2 Duo E8200

The Core 2 Duo E8200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,144 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G460 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the Core 2 Duo E8200 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core 2 Duo E8200 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron G460 versus 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8200 — a 38.9% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E8200 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Celeron G460 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E8200 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G460 scores 1,145 against the Core 2 Duo E8200's 1,144 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G460. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 300 vs 350, a 15.4% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8200 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 1.5 MB on the Celeron G460 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E8200.

Feature	Celeron G460	Core 2 Duo E8200
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.67 GHz+48%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.66 GHz+48%
L3 Cache	1.5 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB	6 MB (total)+2300%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,145	1,144
Geekbench 6 Single	300	350+17%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	650

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G460 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo E8200 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G460 versus DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo E8200 — the Celeron G460 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G460 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G460) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo E8200) — the Celeron G460 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G460) and P35,P45,G33,G45 (Core 2 Duo E8200).

Feature	Celeron G460	Core 2 Duo E8200
Socket	LGA1155	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066+33%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+300%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Celeron G460 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Core 2 Duo E8200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G460 targets Budget, Core 2 Duo E8200 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G460 rivals Pentium G630; Core 2 Duo E8200 rivals Phenom II X2 550.

Feature	Celeron G460	Core 2 Duo E8200
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Legacy Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G460 was priced at $37, while the Core 2 Duo E8200 came in at $163. On launch pricing ($37 vs $163), Celeron G460 was $126 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G460 delivers 30.9 pts/$ vs 7.0 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E8200 — making the Celeron G460 the 126.1% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G460	Core 2 Duo E8200
MSRP	$37-77%	$163
Performance per Dollar	30.9+341%	7.0
Release Date	2011	2008

Search Celeron G460 on Amazon

Search Core 2 Duo E8200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.