Atom D2700 vs Celeron G460

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom D2700 vs Celeron G460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom D2700 vs Celeron G460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom D2700

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 10W instead of 35W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Celeron G460

2011

Why buy it

✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,145 vs 1,148).
❌Launch MSRP is still $37 MSRP, while Atom D2700 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌250% higher power demand at 35W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom D2700 better than Celeron G460?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G460 is ahead with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom D2700 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom D2700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom D2700 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Atom D2700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $37 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. Celeron G460 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (30.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom D2700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom D2700 vs Celeron G460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom D2700

The Atom D2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,148 points. Launch price was $52.

Celeron G460

The Celeron G460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 December 2011 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,145 points. Launch price was $65.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom D2700 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G460 offers 1 cores / 2 threads — the Atom D2700 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 0.13 GHz on the Atom D2700 versus 1.8 GHz on the Celeron G460 — a 173.1% clock advantage for the Celeron G460 (base: 2.13 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Atom D2700 uses the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G460 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom D2700 scores 1,148 against the Celeron G460's 1,145 — a 0.3% lead for the Atom D2700. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom D2700 vs 1.5 MB on the Celeron G460.

Feature	Atom D2700	Celeron G460
Cores / Threads	2 / 4+100%	1 / 2
Boost Clock	0.13 GHz	1.8 GHz+1285%
Base Clock	2.13 GHz+18%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	1.5 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Cedarview (2011−2012)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,148	1,145
Geekbench 6 Single	—	300

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom D2700 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G460 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Celeron G460 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom D2700) vs 2 (Celeron G460). PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom D2700) vs 16 (Celeron G460) — the Celeron G460 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA559 (Atom D2700) and H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G460).

Feature	Atom D2700	Celeron G460
Socket	FCBGA559	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	32 GB+700%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom D2700) / VT-x (Celeron G460). Both include integrated graphics — Intel GMA 3650 (Atom D2700) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G460) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G460 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G460 rivals Pentium G630.