A6 Micro-6500T vs Atom D2700

A6 Micro-6500T vs Atom D2700 Performance Spectrum

A6 Micro-6500T

4 / 4

1,146

0.0%

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom D2700

2 / 4

1,148

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6 Micro-6500T vs Atom D2700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6 Micro-6500T vs Atom D2700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6 Micro-6500T

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 5W instead of 10W, a 5W reduction.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,146 vs 1,148).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Atom D2700 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Atom D2700

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌100% higher power demand at 10W vs 5W.

Quick Answers

So, is A6 Micro-6500T better than Atom D2700?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6 Micro-6500T is ahead with a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom D2700 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom D2700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6 Micro-6500T is the better buy right now. A6 Micro-6500T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $100 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Atom D2700 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (11.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6 Micro-6500T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6 Micro-6500T vs Atom D2700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6 Micro-6500T

The A6 Micro-6500T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,146 points. Launch price was $69.

Atom D2700

The Atom D2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,148 points. Launch price was $52.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6 Micro-6500T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom D2700 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A6 Micro-6500T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the A6 Micro-6500T versus 0.13 GHz on the Atom D2700 — a 173.1% clock advantage for the A6 Micro-6500T (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The A6 Micro-6500T uses the Mullins (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Atom D2700 uses Cedarview (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6 Micro-6500T scores 1,146 against the Atom D2700's 1,148 — a 0.2% lead for the Atom D2700.

Feature	A6 Micro-6500T	Atom D2700
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz+1285%	0.13 GHz
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	2.13 GHz+78%
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)	512K (per core)+25500%
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Mullins (2014)	Cedarview (2011−2012)
PassMark	1,146	1,148

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6 Micro-6500T uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom D2700 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A6 Micro-6500T versus DDR3-1066 on the Atom D2700 — the A6 Micro-6500T supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6 Micro-6500T supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A6 Micro-6500T) vs 4 (Atom D2700) — the A6 Micro-6500T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A6 Micro-6500T) and Intel FCBGA559 (Atom D2700).

Feature	A6 Micro-6500T	Atom D2700
Socket	FT3	FCBGA559
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+25%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
RAM Channels	1	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8+100%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon R4 (A6 Micro-6500T) and Intel GMA 3650 (Atom D2700) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.