A6 Micro-6500T vs Celeron G460

A6 Micro-6500T vs Celeron G460 Performance Spectrum

A6 Micro-6500T

4 / 4

1,146

+0.1%

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G460

1 / 1

1,145

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6 Micro-6500T vs Celeron G460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6 Micro-6500T vs Celeron G460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6 Micro-6500T

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 5W instead of 35W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.5 vs 30.9 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $37 MSRP).

Celeron G460

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $63 less on MSRP ($37 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 170.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.9 vs 11.5 PassMark/$ ($37 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,145 vs 1,146).
❌600% higher power demand at 35W vs 5W.

Quick Answers

So, is A6 Micro-6500T better than Celeron G460?

Yes. A6 Micro-6500T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6 Micro-6500T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6 Micro-6500T is still the much better call for a fresh build. A6 Micro-6500T comes in 170.3% more expensive on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $37 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G460 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 170.0% better value on paper (30.9 vs 11.5 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6 Micro-6500T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6 Micro-6500T vs Celeron G460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6 Micro-6500T

The A6 Micro-6500T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,146 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron G460

The Celeron G460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 December 2011 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,145 points. Launch price was $65.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6 Micro-6500T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G460 offers 1 cores / 2 threads — the A6 Micro-6500T has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the A6 Micro-6500T versus 1.8 GHz on the Celeron G460 — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The A6 Micro-6500T uses the Mullins (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron G460 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6 Micro-6500T scores 1,146 against the Celeron G460's 1,145 — a 0.1% lead for the A6 Micro-6500T.

Feature	A6 Micro-6500T	Celeron G460
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+300%	1 / 2
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	1.8 GHz+50%
L3 Cache	—	1.5 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)+700%	256 kB
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Mullins (2014)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,146	1,145
Geekbench 6 Single	—	300

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6 Micro-6500T uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G460 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A6 Micro-6500T versus DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G460 — the A6 Micro-6500T supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G460 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6 Micro-6500T) vs 2 (Celeron G460). PCIe lanes: 8 (A6 Micro-6500T) vs 16 (Celeron G460) — the Celeron G460 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A6 Micro-6500T) and H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G460).

Feature	A6 Micro-6500T	Celeron G460
Socket	FT3	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+25%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6 Micro-6500T) / VT-x (Celeron G460). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon R4 (A6 Micro-6500T) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G460) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G460 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G460 rivals Pentium G630.

Feature	A6 Micro-6500T	Celeron G460
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon R4	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x
Target Use	—	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A6 Micro-6500T was priced at $100, while the Celeron G460 came in at $37. On launch pricing ($100 vs $37), Celeron G460 was $63 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A6 Micro-6500T delivers 11.5 pts/$ vs 30.9 pts/$ for the Celeron G460 — making the Celeron G460 the 91.9% better value option.

Feature	A6 Micro-6500T	Celeron G460
MSRP	$100	$37-63%
Performance per Dollar	11.5	30.9+169%
Release Date	2014	2011

Search A6 Micro-6500T on Amazon

Search Celeron G460 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.