A6 Micro-6500T vs Celeron E3300

A6 Micro-6500T vs Celeron E3300 Performance Spectrum

A6 Micro-6500T

4 / 4

1,146

0.0%

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron E3300

2 / 2

1,155

+0.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6 Micro-6500T vs Celeron E3300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6 Micro-6500T vs Celeron E3300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6 Micro-6500T

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 5W instead of 65W, a 60W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R4, while Celeron E3300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,146 vs 1,155).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.5 vs 23.1 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Celeron E3300

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 101.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.1 vs 11.5 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌1200% higher power demand at 65W vs 5W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6 Micro-6500T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron E3300 better than A6 Micro-6500T?

Yes. Celeron E3300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron E3300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 39 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron E3300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron E3300 is the better buy right now. Celeron E3300 comes in $50 cheaper on MSRP at $50 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 101.6% better value on MSRP (23.1 vs 11.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6 Micro-6500T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6 Micro-6500T vs Celeron E3300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6 Micro-6500T

The A6 Micro-6500T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,146 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron E3300

The Celeron E3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,155 points. Launch price was $70.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6 Micro-6500T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron E3300 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A6 Micro-6500T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the A6 Micro-6500T versus 2.5 GHz on the Celeron E3300 — a 32.6% clock advantage for the Celeron E3300 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The A6 Micro-6500T uses the Mullins (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron E3300 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6 Micro-6500T scores 1,146 against the Celeron E3300's 1,155 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron E3300.

Feature	A6 Micro-6500T	Celeron E3300
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.5 GHz+39%
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	2.5 GHz+108%
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)+100%	1 MB (total)
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Mullins (2014)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,146	1,155
Geekbench 6 Single	—	347
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	624

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6 Micro-6500T uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron E3300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A6 Micro-6500T versus DDR3-1066 on the Celeron E3300 — the A6 Micro-6500T supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6 Micro-6500T supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6 Micro-6500T) vs 2 (Celeron E3300). PCIe lanes: 8 (A6 Micro-6500T) vs 0 (Celeron E3300) — the A6 Micro-6500T offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A6 Micro-6500T) and G31,G41,P45 (Celeron E3300).

Feature	A6 Micro-6500T	Celeron E3300
Socket	FT3	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+25%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6 Micro-6500T) / VT-x (Celeron E3300). The A6 Micro-6500T includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R4), while the Celeron E3300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron E3300 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E3300 rivals Pentium E5200.

Feature	A6 Micro-6500T	Celeron E3300
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon R4	—
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x
Target Use	—	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A6 Micro-6500T was priced at $100, while the Celeron E3300 came in at $50. On launch pricing ($100 vs $50), Celeron E3300 was $50 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A6 Micro-6500T delivers 11.5 pts/$ vs 23.1 pts/$ for the Celeron E3300 — making the Celeron E3300 the 67.4% better value option.

Feature	A6 Micro-6500T	Celeron E3300
MSRP	$100	$50-50%
Performance per Dollar	11.5	23.1+101%
Release Date	2014	2009

Search A6 Micro-6500T on Amazon

Search Celeron E3300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.