CPU
GPU
A6 Micro-6500T
Core 2 Duo E7600
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6 Micro-6500T is positioned at rank 1045 and the Core 2 Duo E7600 is on rank 1019, so the Core 2 Duo E7600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A6 Micro-6500T
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E7600
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A6 Micro-6500T | Core 2 Duo E7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Mullins (2014) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A6 Micro-6500T | Core 2 Duo E7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+232%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A6 Micro-6500T and Core 2 Duo E7600
A6 Micro-6500T
The A6 Micro-6500T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,146 points. Launch price was $69.
Core 2 Duo E7600
The Core 2 Duo E7600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 3 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,150 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
The A6 Micro-6500T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo E7600 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A6 Micro-6500T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the A6 Micro-6500T versus 0.07 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E7600 — a 185% clock advantage for the A6 Micro-6500T (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The A6 Micro-6500T uses the Mullins (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E7600 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6 Micro-6500T scores 1,146 against the Core 2 Duo E7600's 1,150 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo E7600.
| Feature | A6 Micro-6500T | Core 2 Duo E7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz+2471% | 0.07 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 3.06 GHz+155% |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 3 MB (total)+50% |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Mullins (2014) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,146 | 1,150 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 422 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 690 |
Memory & Platform
The A6 Micro-6500T uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E7600 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (A6 Micro-6500T) vs 2 (Core 2 Duo E7600). PCIe lanes: 8 (A6 Micro-6500T) vs 16 (Core 2 Duo E7600) — the Core 2 Duo E7600 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A6 Micro-6500T) and P45,P43,G45,G43,P35,G33 (Core 2 Duo E7600).
| Feature | A6 Micro-6500T | Core 2 Duo E7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (A6 Micro-6500T) / VT-x (Core 2 Duo E7600). The A6 Micro-6500T includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R4), while the Core 2 Duo E7600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo E7600 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E7600 rivals Athlon II X2 250.
| Feature | A6 Micro-6500T | Core 2 Duo E7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon R4 | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Legacy Desktop |
Value Analysis
The A6 Micro-6500T launched at $100 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo E7600 debuted at $133. At current prices ($15 vs $50), the A6 Micro-6500T is $35 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A6 Micro-6500T delivers 76.4 pts/$ vs 23.0 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E7600 — making the A6 Micro-6500T the 107.4% better value option.
| Feature | A6 Micro-6500T | Core 2 Duo E7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-25% | $133 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-70% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 76.4+232% | 23.0 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A6 Micro-6500T and Core 2 Duo E7600
