A4-4000 vs Atom D2700

A4-4000 vs Atom D2700 Performance Spectrum

A4-4000

2 / 2

1,152

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom D2700

2 / 4

1,148

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-4000 vs Atom D2700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-4000 vs Atom D2700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-4000

2013

Why buy it

✅100% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Atom D2700.

Trade-offs

❌550% higher power demand at 65W vs 10W.

Atom D2700

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 65W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,148 vs 1,152).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A4-4000.

Quick Answers

So, is A4-4000 better than Atom D2700?

Yes. A4-4000 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A4-4000 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4-4000 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-4000 still makes the most sense overall. A4-4000 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-4000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4-4000 vs Atom D2700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-4000

The A4-4000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,152 points. Launch price was $50.

Atom D2700

The Atom D2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,148 points. Launch price was $52.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-4000 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Atom D2700's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A4-4000 versus 0.13 GHz on the Atom D2700 — a 184.4% clock advantage for the A4-4000 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The A4-4000 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Atom D2700 uses Cedarview (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-4000 scores 1,152 against the Atom D2700's 1,148 — a 0.3% lead for the A4-4000. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A4-4000	Atom D2700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+2362%	0.13 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+41%	2.13 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Cedarview (2011−2012)
PassMark	1,152	1,148
Geekbench 6 Single	348	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-4000 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom D2700 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A4-4000 versus DDR3-1066 on the Atom D2700 — the A4-4000 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A4-4000 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (A4-4000) vs 1 (Atom D2700). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-4000) vs 4 (Atom D2700) — the A4-4000 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X,A88X (A4-4000) and Intel FCBGA559 (Atom D2700).

Feature	A4-4000	Atom D2700
Socket	FM2	FCBGA559
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+25%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+700%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8+100%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-4000) / not specified (Atom D2700). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7480D (A4-4000) and Intel GMA 3650 (Atom D2700) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-4000 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-4000 rivals Celeron G1610.