A4-4000 vs Pentium A1020

A4-4000 vs Pentium A1020 Performance Spectrum

A4-4000

2 / 2

1,152

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium A1020

4 / 4

1,167

+1.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-4000 vs Pentium A1020 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-4000 vs Pentium A1020: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-4000

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7480D, while Pentium A1020 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium A1020.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,152 vs 1,167).
❌550% higher power demand at 65W vs 10W.

Pentium A1020

2016

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 10W instead of 65W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while A4-4000 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-4000 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A4-4000.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium A1020 better than A4-4000?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A4-4000 is ahead with a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium A1020 pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium A1020 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium A1020 is the better buy right now. Pentium A1020 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $86 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that A4-4000 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium A1020 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4-4000 vs Pentium A1020 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-4000

The A4-4000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,152 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium A1020

The Pentium A1020 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,167 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-4000 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium A1020 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium A1020 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A4-4000 versus 2.7 GHz on the Pentium A1020 — a 16.9% clock advantage for the A4-4000 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.41 GHz). The A4-4000 is built on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. In PassMark, the A4-4000 scores 1,152 against the Pentium A1020's 1,167 — a 1.3% lead for the Pentium A1020. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-4000 vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium A1020.

Feature	A4-4000	Pentium A1020
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+19%	2.7 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+24%	2.41 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	—
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	—
PassMark	1,152	1,167+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	348	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-4000 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium A1020 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A4-4000	Pentium A1020
Socket	FM2	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-4000) / not specified (Pentium A1020). The A4-4000 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7480D), while the Pentium A1020 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-4000 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-4000 rivals Celeron G1610.