A4-4000 vs Xeon W3505

A4-4000 vs Xeon W3505 Performance Spectrum

A4-4000

2 / 2

1,152

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon W3505

2 / 2

1,163

+1.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-4000 vs Xeon W3505 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-4000 vs Xeon W3505: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-4000

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7480D, while Xeon W3505 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W3505.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,152 vs 1,163).

Xeon W3505

2009

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-4000 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A4-4000.

Quick Answers

So, is A4-4000 better than Xeon W3505?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W3505 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A4-4000 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W3505 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-4000 still makes the most sense overall. A4-4000 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-4000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-4000 vs Xeon W3505 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-4000

The A4-4000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,152 points. Launch price was $50.

Xeon W3505

The Xeon W3505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 0.53 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,163 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A4-4000 and Xeon W3505 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A4-4000 versus 0.53 GHz on the Xeon W3505 — a 143.2% clock advantage for the A4-4000 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The A4-4000 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon W3505 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A4-4000 scores 1,152 against the Xeon W3505's 1,163 — a 1% lead for the Xeon W3505. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-4000 vs 4 MB (total) on the Xeon W3505.

Feature	A4-4000	Xeon W3505
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+504%	0.53 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+19%	2.53 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,152	1,163
Geekbench 6 Single	348	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-4000 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3505 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A4-4000	Xeon W3505
Socket	FM2	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-4000) / not specified (Xeon W3505). The A4-4000 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7480D), while the Xeon W3505 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-4000 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-4000 rivals Celeron G1610.