Atom D2700 vs Celeron J1900

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom D2700 vs Celeron J1900 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom D2700 vs Celeron J1900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom D2700

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,148 vs 1,152).
❌400% higher power demand at 10W vs 2W.

Celeron J1900

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 10W, a 8W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J1900 better than Atom D2700?

Yes. Celeron J1900 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron J1900 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J1900 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron J1900 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron J1900 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J1900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom D2700 vs Celeron J1900 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom D2700

The Atom D2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,148 points. Launch price was $52.

Celeron J1900

The Celeron J1900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.42 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,152 points. Launch price was $82.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom D2700 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron J1900 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J1900 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.13 GHz on the Atom D2700 versus 2.42 GHz on the Celeron J1900 — a 179.6% clock advantage for the Celeron J1900 (base: 2.13 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Atom D2700 uses the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron J1900 uses Bay Trail-D (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom D2700 scores 1,148 against the Celeron J1900's 1,152 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron J1900. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom D2700 vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1900.

Feature	Atom D2700	Celeron J1900
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	0.13 GHz	2.42 GHz+1762%
Base Clock	2.13 GHz+6%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Cedarview (2011−2012)	Bay Trail-D (2013)
PassMark	1,148	1,152

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom D2700 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron J1900 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Atom D2700 versus DDR3L-1333 on the Celeron J1900 — the Celeron J1900 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron J1900 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom D2700) vs 2 (Celeron J1900). Both provide 4 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA559 (Atom D2700) and Bay Trail SoC (Celeron J1900).

Feature	Atom D2700	Celeron J1900
Socket	FCBGA559	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	DDR3L-1333+25%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Both include integrated graphics — Intel GMA 3650 (Atom D2700) and Intel HD Graphics (Celeron J1900) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.