Atom D2700 vs Xeon W3505

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom D2700 vs Xeon W3505 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom D2700 vs Xeon W3505: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom D2700

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 130W, a 120W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3650, while Xeon W3505 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,148 vs 1,163).

Xeon W3505

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌1200% higher power demand at 130W vs 10W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom D2700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W3505 better than Atom D2700?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W3505 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Atom D2700 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W3505 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W3505 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W3505 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon W3505 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom D2700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom D2700 vs Xeon W3505 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom D2700

The Atom D2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,148 points. Launch price was $52.

Xeon W3505

The Xeon W3505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 0.53 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,163 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom D2700 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon W3505's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.13 GHz on the Atom D2700 versus 0.53 GHz on the Xeon W3505 — a 121.2% clock advantage for the Xeon W3505 (base: 2.13 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The Atom D2700 uses the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon W3505 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom D2700 scores 1,148 against the Xeon W3505's 1,163 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon W3505. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom D2700 vs 4 MB (total) on the Xeon W3505.

Feature	Atom D2700	Xeon W3505
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	0.13 GHz	0.53 GHz+308%
Base Clock	2.13 GHz	2.53 GHz+19%
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Cedarview (2011−2012)	Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,148	1,163+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom D2700 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon W3505 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.