Atom D2700 vs Celeron E3300

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom D2700 vs Celeron E3300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom D2700 vs Celeron E3300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom D2700

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 65W, a 55W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3650, while Celeron E3300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,148 vs 1,155).

Celeron E3300

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while Atom D2700 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌550% higher power demand at 65W vs 10W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom D2700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron E3300 better than Atom D2700?

Yes. Celeron E3300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron E3300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron E3300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron E3300 is the better buy right now. Celeron E3300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $50 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (23.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom D2700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom D2700 vs Celeron E3300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom D2700

The Atom D2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,148 points. Launch price was $52.

Celeron E3300

The Celeron E3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,155 points. Launch price was $70.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom D2700 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron E3300's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.13 GHz on the Atom D2700 versus 2.5 GHz on the Celeron E3300 — a 180.2% clock advantage for the Celeron E3300 (base: 2.13 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Atom D2700 uses the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron E3300 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom D2700 scores 1,148 against the Celeron E3300's 1,155 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron E3300. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom D2700	Celeron E3300
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	0.13 GHz	2.5 GHz+1823%
Base Clock	2.13 GHz	2.5 GHz+17%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (total)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Cedarview (2011−2012)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,148	1,155
Geekbench 6 Single	—	347
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	624

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom D2700 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron E3300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Celeron E3300 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom D2700) vs 2 (Celeron E3300). PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom D2700) vs 0 (Celeron E3300) — the Atom D2700 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA559 (Atom D2700) and G31,G41,P45 (Celeron E3300).

Feature	Atom D2700	Celeron E3300
Socket	FCBGA559	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom D2700) / VT-x (Celeron E3300). The Atom D2700 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3650), while the Celeron E3300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron E3300 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E3300 rivals Pentium E5200.