Atom D2700 vs Core 2 Duo E8200
Atom D2700
Core 2 Duo E8200
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom D2700 is positioned at rank 490 and the Core 2 Duo E8200 is on rank 1048, so the Atom D2700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Atom D2700
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E8200
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Atom D2700 | Core 2 Duo E8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Cedarview (2011−2012) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Atom D2700 | Core 2 Duo E8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom D2700 and Core 2 Duo E8200
Atom D2700
The Atom D2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,148 points. Launch price was $52.
Core 2 Duo E8200
The Core 2 Duo E8200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,144 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
The Atom D2700 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core 2 Duo E8200's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.13 GHz on the Atom D2700 versus 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8200 — a 181.4% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E8200 (base: 2.13 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Atom D2700 uses the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E8200 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom D2700 scores 1,148 against the Core 2 Duo E8200's 1,144 — a 0.3% lead for the Atom D2700. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Atom D2700 | Core 2 Duo E8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 0.13 GHz | 2.67 GHz+1954% |
| Base Clock | 2.13 GHz | 2.66 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 6 MB (total)+1100% |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Cedarview (2011−2012) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,148 | 1,144 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 350 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 650 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom D2700 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo E8200 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Atom D2700 versus DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo E8200 — the Atom D2700 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Duo E8200 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom D2700) vs 2 (Core 2 Duo E8200). PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom D2700) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo E8200) — the Atom D2700 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA559 (Atom D2700) and P35,P45,G33,G45 (Core 2 Duo E8200).
| Feature | Atom D2700 | Core 2 Duo E8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA559 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066+50% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom D2700) / VT-x (Core 2 Duo E8200). The Atom D2700 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3650), while the Core 2 Duo E8200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo E8200 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E8200 rivals Phenom II X2 550.
| Feature | Atom D2700 | Core 2 Duo E8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel GMA 3650 | — |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Legacy Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Atom D2700 and Core 2 Duo E8200
