A4-4000 vs Celeron G460

A4-4000 vs Celeron G460 Performance Spectrum

A4-4000

2 / 2

1,152

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G460

1 / 1

1,145

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-4000 vs Celeron G460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-4000 vs Celeron G460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-4000

2013

Why buy it

✅+16% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron G460.

Trade-offs

❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Celeron G460

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (300 vs 348).
❌Lower PassMark (1,145 vs 1,152).
❌Launch MSRP is still $37 MSRP, while A4-4000 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A4-4000.

Quick Answers

So, is A4-4000 better than Celeron G460?

Yes. A4-4000 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A4-4000 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4-4000 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-4000 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A4-4000 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $37 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G460 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (30.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-4000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4-4000 vs Celeron G460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-4000

The A4-4000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,152 points. Launch price was $50.

Celeron G460

The Celeron G460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 December 2011 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,145 points. Launch price was $65.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-4000 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron G460 offers 1 cores / 2 threads — the A4-4000 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A4-4000 versus 1.8 GHz on the Celeron G460 — a 56% clock advantage for the A4-4000 (base: 3 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The A4-4000 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G460 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-4000 scores 1,152 against the Celeron G460's 1,145 — a 0.6% lead for the A4-4000. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 348 vs 300, a 14.8% lead for the A4-4000 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-4000 vs 1.5 MB on the Celeron G460.

Feature	A4-4000	Celeron G460
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 2
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+78%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+67%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	1.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256 kB
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,152	1,145
Geekbench 6 Single	348+16%	300

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-4000 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G460 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A4-4000 versus DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G460 — the A4-4000 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-4000) vs 16 (Celeron G460) — the Celeron G460 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X,A88X (A4-4000) and H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G460).

Feature	A4-4000	Celeron G460
Socket	FM2	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+25%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-4000) vs VT-x (Celeron G460). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7480D (A4-4000) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G460) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-4000 targets Budget Desktop, Celeron G460 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A4-4000 rivals Celeron G1610; Celeron G460 rivals Pentium G630.