A4-4000
VS
Celeron G460

A4-4000 vs Celeron G460

AMD

A4-4000

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Celeron G460

1 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A4-4000 is positioned at rank 811 and the Celeron G460 is on rank 586, so the Celeron G460 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A4-4000

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16235%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15341%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11139%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3356%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2658%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2325%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1332%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1314%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1197%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1197%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1183%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1151%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1135%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1131%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1120%
#811
A4-4000
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#812
Core i3-3250T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
100%
#813
Core i5-5575R
MSRP: $265|Avg: $50
100%
#815
Core i3-3210
MSRP: $117|Avg: $25
99%
#816
Celeron G3900E
MSRP: $107|Avg: $35
99%
#817
Athlon II X3 435
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
98%
#818
Core i7-6822EQ
MSRP: $294|Avg: $190
98%
#819
Athlon II X4 645
MSRP: $126|Avg: $20
98%
#820
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
97%
#821
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
97%
#822
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
97%
#823
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
97%
#824
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
97%
#825
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G460

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10072%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9517%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6910%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2082%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1649%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1442%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
826%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
815%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
742%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
742%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
734%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
714%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
704%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
701%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
695%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
99%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
98%
#586
Celeron G460
MSRP: $37|Avg: $10
100%
#587
A4 PRO-7350B
MSRP: $50|Avg: $11
100%
#589
Pentium G3220T
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
99%
#590
Celeron G1620
MSRP: $52|Avg: $40
99%
#591
Core i5-7600T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $60
98%
#593
Core i3-7300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $128
97%
#594
Celeron G1830
MSRP: $52|Avg: $5
97%
#596
Core i3-4160
MSRP: $117|Avg: $52
97%
#598
FX-8350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $130
96%
#599
Athlon X4 760K
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
96%
#600
Core i5-6400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $57
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A4-4000 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron G460 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightA4-4000Celeron G460
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA4-4000Celeron G460
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A4-4000 and Celeron G460

AMD

A4-4000

The A4-4000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,152 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Celeron G460

The Celeron G460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 December 2011 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,145 points. Launch price was $65.

Processing Power

The A4-4000 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron G460 offers 1 cores / 2 threads — the A4-4000 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A4-4000 versus 1.8 GHz on the Celeron G460 — a 56% clock advantage for the A4-4000 (base: 3 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The A4-4000 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G460 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-4000 scores 1,152 against the Celeron G460's 1,145 — a 0.6% lead for the A4-4000. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 348 vs 300, a 14.8% lead for the A4-4000 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-4000 vs 1.5 MB on the Celeron G460.

FeatureA4-4000Celeron G460
Cores / Threads
2 / 2+100%
1 / 2
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+78%
1.8 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+67%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
1.5 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+300%
256 kB
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,152
1,145
Geekbench 6 Single
348+16%
300
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-4000 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G460 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-4000) vs 16 (Celeron G460) — the Celeron G460 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X,A88X (A4-4000) and H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G460).

FeatureA4-4000Celeron G460
Socket
FM2
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-4000) vs VT-x (Celeron G460). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 7480D (A4-4000) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G460) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-4000 targets Budget Desktop, Celeron G460 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A4-4000 rivals Celeron G1610; Celeron G460 rivals Pentium G630.

FeatureA4-4000Celeron G460
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7480D
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x
Target Use
Budget Desktop
Budget