PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G460 vs Core i5-2537M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G460 vs Core i5-2537M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G460

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $213 less on MSRP ($37 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 576.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.9 vs 4.6 PassMark/$ ($37 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (300 vs 427).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 3 MB).
❌105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.

Core i5-2537M

2011

Why buy it

✅+42.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 1.5 MB).
✅Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,144 vs 1,145).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.6 vs 30.9 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $37 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G460 better than Core i5-2537M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-2537M is ahead with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G460 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Core i5-2537M also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G460 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G460 is the better buy right now. Celeron G460 comes in $213 cheaper on MSRP at $37 MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i5-2537M is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 576.3% better value on MSRP (30.9 vs 4.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-2537M is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Celeron G460 vs Core i5-2537M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G460

The Celeron G460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 December 2011 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,145 points. Launch price was $65.

Core i5-2537M

The Core i5-2537M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,144 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G460 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-2537M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-2537M has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron G460 versus 2.3 GHz on the Core i5-2537M — a 24.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-2537M (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). Both are built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron G460 scores 1,145 against the Core i5-2537M's 1,144 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G460. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 300 vs 427, a 34.9% lead for the Core i5-2537M that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 1.5 MB on the Celeron G460 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2537M.

Feature	Celeron G460	Core i5-2537M
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	2 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.3 GHz+28%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz+29%	1.4 GHz
L3 Cache	1.5 MB	3 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256 kB	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,145	1,144
Geekbench 6 Single	300	427+42%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	717

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G460 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-2537M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G460 versus 1333 on the Core i5-2537M — the Core i5-2537M supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G460 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G460) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS57,QS67,UM67 (Core i5-2537M).

Feature	Celeron G460	Core i5-2537M
Socket	LGA1155	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	1333+25%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G460) vs true (Core i5-2537M). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G460) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i5-2537M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G460 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G460 rivals Pentium G630; Core i5-2537M rivals Core i5-2410M.

Feature	Celeron G460	Core i5-2537M
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	true
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G460 was priced at $37, while the Core i5-2537M came in at $250. On launch pricing ($37 vs $250), Celeron G460 was $213 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G460 delivers 30.9 pts/$ vs 4.6 pts/$ for the Core i5-2537M — making the Celeron G460 the 148.5% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G460	Core i5-2537M
MSRP	$37-85%	$250
Performance per Dollar	30.9+572%	4.6
Release Date	2011	2011

Search Celeron G460 on Amazon

Search Core i5-2537M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.