Celeron G540T vs E2-3800
Celeron G540T
E2-3800
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G540T is positioned at rank 639 and the E2-3800 is on rank 1047, so the Celeron G540T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G540T
Performance Per Dollar E2-3800
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron G540T | E2-3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($42) | ✅ More affordable ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Kabini (2013−2014) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron G540T | E2-3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+110%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($42) | ✅ More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G540T and E2-3800
Celeron G540T
The Celeron G540T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,137 points. Launch price was $69.
E2-3800
The E2-3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,136 points. Launch price was $50.
Processing Power
The Celeron G540T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the E2-3800 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the E2-3800 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Celeron G540T versus 1.3 GHz on the E2-3800 — a 47.1% clock advantage for the Celeron G540T. The Celeron G540T uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the E2-3800 uses Kabini (2013−2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G540T scores 1,137 against the E2-3800's 1,136 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G540T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 384 vs 136, a 95.4% lead for the Celeron G540T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 655 vs 389 (51% advantage for the Celeron G540T).
| Feature | Celeron G540T | E2-3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.1 GHz+62% | 1.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 2048 kB+700% |
| Process | 32 nm | 28 nm-13% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Kabini (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 1,137 | 1,136 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 384+182% | 136 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 655+68% | 389 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G540T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the E2-3800 uses FT3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Celeron G540T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron G540T) vs 1 (E2-3800). PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G540T) vs 4 (E2-3800) — the Celeron G540T offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,H67,P67,Z68,B75,Z77 (Celeron G540T) and SoC (E2-3800).
| Feature | Celeron G540T | E2-3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | FT3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+100% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+300% | 4 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G540T) vs Yes (E2-3800). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G540T) and Radeon HD 8280 (E2-3800) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G540T targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G540T rivals Pentium G630T.
| Feature | Celeron G540T | E2-3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | Radeon HD 8280 |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | Yes |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Celeron G540T launched at $42 MSRP, while the E2-3800 debuted at $100. At current prices ($42 vs $20), the E2-3800 is $22 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G540T delivers 27.1 pts/$ vs 56.8 pts/$ for the E2-3800 — making the E2-3800 the 70.9% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G540T | E2-3800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $42-58% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $42 | $20-52% |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.1 | 56.8+110% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron G540T and E2-3800
