A6-5345M vs Celeron G540T

A6-5345M vs Celeron G540T Performance Spectrum

A6-5345M

2 / 2

1,122

0.0%

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G540T

2 / 2

1,137

+1.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-5345M vs Celeron G540T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-5345M vs Celeron G540T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-5345M

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (250 vs 384).
❌Lower PassMark (1,122 vs 1,137).

Celeron G540T

2011

Why buy it

✅+53.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while A6-5345M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G540T better than A6-5345M?

Yes. Celeron G540T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G540T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.9% more average FPS across 46 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G540T is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G540T is the better buy right now. Celeron G540T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (27.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-5345M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-5345M vs Celeron G540T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-5345M

The A6-5345M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,122 points. Launch price was $70.

Celeron G540T

The Celeron G540T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,137 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-5345M and Celeron G540T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the A6-5345M versus 2.1 GHz on the Celeron G540T — a 28.6% clock advantage for the A6-5345M (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The A6-5345M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G540T uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6-5345M scores 1,122 against the Celeron G540T's 1,137 — a 1.3% lead for the Celeron G540T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 250 vs 384, a 42.3% lead for the Celeron G540T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-5345M vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G540T.

Feature	A6-5345M	Celeron G540T
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+33%	2.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+5%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,122	1,137+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	250	384+54%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	655

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-5345M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G540T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Celeron G540T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	A6-5345M	Celeron G540T
Socket	FP2	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	32 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-5345M) vs VT-x (Celeron G540T). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8410G (A6-5345M) and Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G540T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5345M targets Budget Laptop, Celeron G540T targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A6-5345M rivals Celeron 1005M; Celeron G540T rivals Pentium G630T.

Feature	A6-5345M	Celeron G540T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 8410G	Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x
Target Use	Budget Laptop	Desktop