A6-5345M vs Athlon II X2 245

A6-5345M vs Athlon II X2 245 Performance Spectrum

A6-5345M

2 / 2

1,122

0.0%

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon II X2 245

2 / 2

1,134

+1.1%

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-5345M vs Athlon II X2 245 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-5345M vs Athlon II X2 245: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-5345M

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 17W instead of 65W, a 48W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8410G, while Athlon II X2 245 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,122 vs 1,134).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 245.

Athlon II X2 245

2009

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike A6-5345M.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $66 MSRP, while A6-5345M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌282.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 17W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-5345M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X2 245 better than A6-5345M?

Yes. Athlon II X2 245 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon II X2 245 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X2 245 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II X2 245 is the better buy right now. Athlon II X2 245 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $66 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (17.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-5345M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-5345M vs Athlon II X2 245 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-5345M

The A6-5345M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,122 points. Launch price was $70.

Athlon II X2 245

The Athlon II X2 245 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,134 points. Launch price was $35.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-5345M and Athlon II X2 245 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the A6-5345M versus 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X2 245 — a 3.5% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 245 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A6-5345M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X2 245 uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-5345M scores 1,122 against the Athlon II X2 245's 1,134 — a 1.1% lead for the Athlon II X2 245. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A6-5345M	Athlon II X2 245
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	2.9 GHz+4%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.9 GHz+32%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Regor (2009−2013)
PassMark	1,122	1,134+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	250	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-5345M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X2 245 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Athlon II X2 245 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-5345M) vs 0 (Athlon II X2 245) — the A6-5345M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A6-5345M	Athlon II X2 245
Socket	FP2	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	1333
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-5345M) vs true (Athlon II X2 245). The A6-5345M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8410G), while the Athlon II X2 245 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5345M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-5345M rivals Celeron 1005M; Athlon II X2 245 rivals Pentium E5500.