
A6-5345M

Athlon II X2 245e
A6-5345M vs Athlon II X2 245e Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A6-5345M vs Athlon II X2 245e FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A6-5345M vs Athlon II X2 245e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A6-5345M
2013Why buy it
- β Draws 17W instead of 45W, a 28W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8410G, while Athlon II X2 245e needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon II X2 245e across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (1,122 vs 1,141).
Athlon II X2 245e
2010Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $87 MSRP, while A6-5345M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β164.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 17W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while A6-5345M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X2 245e better than A6-5345M?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A6-5345M vs Athlon II X2 245e Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-5345M
The A6-5345M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013β2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,122 points. Launch price was $70.

Athlon II X2 245e
The Athlon II X2 245e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009β2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,141 points. Launch price was $80.
Processing Power
Both the A6-5345M and Athlon II X2 245e share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the A6-5345M versus 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X2 245e β a 3.5% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 245e (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A6-5345M uses the Richland (2013β2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X2 245e uses Regor (2009β2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-5345M scores 1,122 against the Athlon II X2 245e's 1,141 β a 1.7% lead for the Athlon II X2 245e. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 250 vs 319, a 24.3% lead for the Athlon II X2 245e that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | A6-5345M | Athlon II X2 245e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | 2.9 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.9 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+51100% | 1 MB |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Richland (2013β2014) | Regor (2009β2013) |
| PassMark | 1,122 | 1,141+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 250 | 319+28% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 741 |
Memory & Platform
The A6-5345M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X2 245e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Athlon II X2 245e supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support.
| Feature | A6-5345M | Athlon II X2 245e |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP2 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | β |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A6-5345M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8410G), while the Athlon II X2 245e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5345M targets Budget Laptop, Athlon II X2 245e targets Budget. Direct competitor: A6-5345M rivals Celeron 1005M; Athlon II X2 245e rivals Athlon II X2 270u.
| Feature | A6-5345M | Athlon II X2 245e |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8410G | β |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget Laptop | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















