Celeron G6900 vs Core i3-8100H

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G6900 vs Core i3-8100H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G6900 vs Core i3-8100H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G6900

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $52 MSRP, while Core i3-8100H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌4500% higher power demand at 46W vs 1W.

Core i3-8100H

2018

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Draws 1W instead of 46W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G6900 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,435 vs 4,458).
❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Celeron G6900 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G6900 better than Core i3-8100H?

Yes. Celeron G6900 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G6900 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G6900 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G6900 is the better buy right now. Celeron G6900 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $52 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (85.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G6900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2018), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of BGA1440, and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron G6900 vs Core i3-8100H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900

The Celeron G6900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 4,458 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-8100H

The Core i3-8100H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 July 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,435 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i3-8100H offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i3-8100H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Celeron G6900 versus 3 GHz on the Core i3-8100H — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Celeron G6900 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Celeron G6900 uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i3-8100H uses Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900 scores 4,458 against the Core i3-8100H's 4,435 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron G6900. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900 vs 6 MB on the Core i3-8100H.

Feature	Celeron G6900	Core i3-8100H
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+13%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+13%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	6 MB+50%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)
PassMark	4,458	4,435
Geekbench 6 Single	1,563	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,631	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G6900 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i3-8100H uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Celeron G6900 versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i3-8100H — the Celeron G6900 supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G6900 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Celeron G6900) vs 16 (Core i3-8100H) — the Celeron G6900 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Celeron G6900	Core i3-8100H
Socket	LGA1700	BGA1440
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+80%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+100%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20+25%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G6900) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-8100H). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 710 (Celeron G6900) and UHD Graphics 630 (Core i3-8100H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900 targets Budget, Core i3-8100H targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900 rivals Pentium Gold G7400.