
Celeron G6900

Core i7-1068G7
Celeron G6900 vs Core i7-1068G7 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G6900 vs Core i7-1068G7 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G6900 vs Core i7-1068G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G6900
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 710, while Core i7-1068G7 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-1068G7 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $52 MSRP, while Core i7-1068G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌64.3% higher power demand at 46W vs 28W.
Core i7-1068G7
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 46W, a 18W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,449 vs 4,458).
- ❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Celeron G6900 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G6900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G6900 better than Core i7-1068G7?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G6900 vs Core i7-1068G7 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900
The Celeron G6900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 4,458 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i7-1068G7
The Core i7-1068G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,449 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron G6900 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i7-1068G7 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-1068G7 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Celeron G6900 versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i7-1068G7 — a 18.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-1068G7 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Celeron G6900 uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-1068G7 uses Ice Lake (Client) (2019) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900 scores 4,458 against the Core i7-1068G7's 4,449 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron G6900. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-1068G7.
| Feature | Celeron G6900 | Core i7-1068G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.1 GHz+21% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+48% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 256K (per core)+20380% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Ice Lake (Client) (2019) |
| PassMark | 4,458 | 4,449 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,563 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,631 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G6900 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-1068G7 uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron G6900 | Core i7-1068G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G6900) / not specified (Core i7-1068G7). The Celeron G6900 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 710), while the Core i7-1068G7 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900 rivals Pentium Gold G7400.
| Feature | Celeron G6900 | Core i7-1068G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 710 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













