PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G6900 vs Core i5-4670T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G6900 vs Core i5-4670T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G6900

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $137 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
✅Delivers 261.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 85.7 vs 23.7 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1150 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 710, while Core i5-4670T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,458 vs 4,488).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).

Core i5-4670T

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 46W, a 1W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.7 vs 85.7 PassMark/$ ($189 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1150, while Celeron G6900 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G6900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G6900 better than Core i5-4670T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G6900 is ahead with a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4670T pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. Core i5-4670T also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4670T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G6900 is the better buy right now. Celeron G6900 comes in $137 cheaper on MSRP at $52 MSRP versus $189 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-4670T is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. It is also 261.0% better value on MSRP (85.7 vs 23.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G6900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2013) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1150. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron G6900 vs Core i5-4670T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900

The Celeron G6900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 4,458 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-4670T

The Core i5-4670T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,488 points. Launch price was $220.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-4670T offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-4670T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Celeron G6900 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4670T — a 3% clock advantage for the Celeron G6900 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Celeron G6900 uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-4670T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900 scores 4,458 against the Core i5-4670T's 4,488 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-4670T. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900 vs 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670T.

Feature	Celeron G6900	Core i5-4670T
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+3%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+48%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	6144 kB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	4,458	4,488
Geekbench 6 Single	1,563	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,631	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G6900 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-4670T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G6900	Core i5-4670T
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G6900) / not specified (Core i5-4670T). The Celeron G6900 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 710), while the Core i5-4670T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900 rivals Pentium Gold G7400.

Feature	Celeron G6900	Core i5-4670T
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 710	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G6900 was priced at $52, while the Core i5-4670T came in at $189. On launch pricing ($52 vs $189), Celeron G6900 was $137 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G6900 delivers 85.7 pts/$ vs 23.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-4670T — making the Celeron G6900 the 113.2% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G6900	Core i5-4670T
MSRP	$52-72%	$189
Performance per Dollar	85.7+262%	23.7
Release Date	2022	2013

Search Celeron G6900 on Amazon

Search Core i5-4670T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.