Celeron G6900
VS
FX-6330

Celeron G6900 vs FX-6330

Intel

Celeron G6900

2 Cores2 Thrd46 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2022
VS
AMD

FX-6330

6 Cores6 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G6900

#307
Core 3 100HL
MSRP: $306|Avg: $280
108%
#308
Core i9-11900F
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $358.87
106%
#309
Core i9-9900T
MSRP: $423|Avg: $215
106%
#310
Core i5-9500T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $132
106%
#311
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
104%
#312
Core i9-10940X
MSRP: $784|Avg: $460
104%
#313
Core i9-10920X
MSRP: $689|Avg: $430
104%
#314
Core i7-10700
MSRP: $365|Avg: $268
104%
#315
Core i5-9600K
MSRP: $263|Avg: $178
103%
#316
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1400
103%
#317
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
103%
#318
Core i3-10305T
MSRP: $143|Avg: $143
103%
#319
Ryzen Embedded V1202B
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
101%
#320
Core i3-10100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $146
101%
#321
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
101%
#322
Celeron G6900
MSRP: $52|Avg: $77
100%
#323
Core i9-11900K
MSRP: $539|Avg: $435
99%
#324
Core i7-12700TE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $350
97%
#325
Core i9-12900E
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
97%
#326
Celeron G4900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $40
97%
#327
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $452
96%
#328
Core i9-9900KS
MSRP: $513|Avg: $350
96%
#329
Core i5-11600T
MSRP: $262|Avg: $262
95%
#330
Core i9-9900K
MSRP: $488|Avg: $331
94%
#331
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
MSRP: $899|Avg: $540
94%
#332
Celeron G4930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
94%
#333
Core i9-9920X
MSRP: $1189|Avg: $464
93%
#334
Core i3-9100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $125
91%
#335
Core i9-10900X
MSRP: $590|Avg: $425
91%
#336
Core i7-8700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $196
90%
#337
Ryzen 5 3600XT
MSRP: $249|Avg: $357
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar FX-6330

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7664%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7242%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5258%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1584%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1255%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1098%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
629%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
621%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
565%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
565%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
559%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
544%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
536%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
534%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
529%
#256
Ryzen 7 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
96%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
96%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
96%
#494
FX-6330
MSRP: $109|Avg: $25
100%
#495
Celeron G1630
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
100%
#499
Pentium G4400
MSRP: $64|Avg: $85
98%
#501
Core i5-8600K
MSRP: $257|Avg: $100
97%
#506
Athlon II X4 651
MSRP: $92|Avg: $92
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G6900 (2022) utilizes Intel 7 nm technology and DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron G6900FX-6330
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($77)
More affordable ($25)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Alder Lake-S (2022) / Intel 7 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-6330 (2015) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron G6900FX-6330
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+206%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($77)
More affordable ($25)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G6900 and FX-6330

Intel

Celeron G6900

The Celeron G6900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 4,458 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

FX-6330

The FX-6330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 December 2015 (9 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,433 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the FX-6330 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6330 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Celeron G6900 versus 4.2 GHz on the FX-6330 — a 21.1% clock advantage for the FX-6330 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Celeron G6900 uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the FX-6330 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900 scores 4,458 against the FX-6330's 4,433 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G6900. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900 vs 8 MB (total) on the FX-6330.

FeatureCeleron G6900FX-6330
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
6 / 6+200%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
4.2 GHz+24%
Base Clock
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz+6%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
6 MB+380%
Process
Intel 7 nm-78%
32 nm
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark
4,458
4,433
Geekbench 6 Single
1,563
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,631
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G6900 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the FX-6330 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron G6900FX-6330
Socket
LGA1700
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+150%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G6900) / not specified (FX-6330). The Celeron G6900 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 710), while the FX-6330 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900 rivals Pentium Gold G7400.

FeatureCeleron G6900FX-6330
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 710
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron G6900 launched at $52 MSRP, while the FX-6330 debuted at $109. At current prices ($77 vs $25), the FX-6330 is $52 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G6900 delivers 57.9 pts/$ vs 177.3 pts/$ for the FX-6330 — making the FX-6330 the 101.5% better value option.

FeatureCeleron G6900FX-6330
MSRP
$52-52%
$109
Avg Price (30d)
$77
$25-68%
Performance per Dollar
57.9
177.3+206%
Release Date
2022
2015