Celeron G6900 vs FX-6330

Celeron G6900 vs FX-6330 Performance Spectrum

Celeron G6900

2 / 2

4,458

+0.6%

4,433

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G6900 vs FX-6330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G6900 vs FX-6330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G6900

2022

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $57 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
✅Delivers 110.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 85.7 vs 40.7 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
✅Draws 46W instead of 125W, a 79W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM3+ and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).

FX-6330

2015

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,433 vs 4,458).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 40.7 vs 85.7 PassMark/$ ($109 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).
❌171.7% higher power demand at 125W vs 46W.
❌Older platform position on AM3+, while Celeron G6900 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G6900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G6900 better than FX-6330?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, FX-6330 is ahead with a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G6900 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. FX-6330 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G6900 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G6900 is the better buy right now. Celeron G6900 comes in $57 cheaper on MSRP at $52 MSRP versus $109 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that FX-6330 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 110.8% better value on MSRP (85.7 vs 40.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G6900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2015), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM3+, and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 6/6. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron G6900 vs FX-6330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900

The Celeron G6900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 4,458 points. Launch price was $69.

FX-6330

The FX-6330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 December 2015 (9 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,433 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the FX-6330 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6330 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Celeron G6900 versus 4.2 GHz on the FX-6330 — a 21.1% clock advantage for the FX-6330 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Celeron G6900 uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the FX-6330 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900 scores 4,458 against the FX-6330's 4,433 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G6900. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900 vs 8 MB (total) on the FX-6330.

Feature	Celeron G6900	FX-6330
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	6 / 6+200%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	4.2 GHz+24%
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	3.6 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	6 MB+380%
Process	Intel 7 nm-78%	32 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark	4,458	4,433
Geekbench 6 Single	1,563	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,631	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G6900 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the FX-6330 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G6900	FX-6330
Socket	LGA1700	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+150%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G6900) / not specified (FX-6330). The Celeron G6900 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 710), while the FX-6330 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900 rivals Pentium Gold G7400.

Feature	Celeron G6900	FX-6330
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 710	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G6900 was priced at $52, while the FX-6330 came in at $109. On launch pricing ($52 vs $109), Celeron G6900 was $57 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G6900 delivers 85.7 pts/$ vs 40.7 pts/$ for the FX-6330 — making the Celeron G6900 the 71.3% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G6900	FX-6330
MSRP	$52-52%	$109
Performance per Dollar	85.7+111%	40.7
Release Date	2022	2015

Search Celeron G6900 on Amazon

Search FX-6330 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.